Which school do you want to support?
Schools need effective and well-prepared teachers, especially in areas where there are high concentrations of students with high needs.
This lesson explains the messy processes and rules that determine who works where in California schools. It explores the power that teachers have (and lack) to choose where they work, and answers the question why so many teachers never move. This lesson also explains the basics about substitute teaching.
Teachers are employed by school districts, not by schools. Every class needs a teacher, and it's a big logistical challenge, even in small schools. Districts can take a mix of two main approaches to determine where their employees work and the classes they teach: push and pull.
California laws about school assignments are complex. It can be challenging for a district to change a teacher assignment if the teacher objects.
Teachers in California public schools are employed by school districts or by charter schools (LEAs).Within a big district, teachers can negotiate a move from one school to another without changing their employer, usually with the cooperation of the school leaders affected. To move to a school in another district is considerably more complicated, because it involves leaving your job and signing a new contract with a new employer. This means relinquishing your seniority, which can imply a pay cut. This is part of the reason teachers tend to stay put.
Funding for education in California is based on school attendance, as Ed100 Chapter 8 will explain.School districts decide how many teachers to employ in each school based on the number of students that they expect will attend. In places where there is high student mobility — that is, where families are more likely to relocate during the school year — this can be a tricky business. California began making historical data available about mobility and stability in 2021. As of October 2023, stabilty data was available only for the 2020-21 school year — a three-year delay.
In general, districts plan the number of teachers at a site based on a ratio of students and teachers. This ratio doesn't generally take teacher experience into account, which can create unintended consequences.
Inexperienced teachers earn lower wages than experienced ones, so a school with many inexperienced teachers has low average staff costs.
Because inexperienced teachers earn lower wages than experienced ones, a school with a large percentage of inexperienced teachers has low staff costs. Conversely, schools with lots of experienced teachers have high true costs. This is not always obvious. Under federal law, districts are obligated to spend money on students equitably across all of their schools. This turns out to be quite difficult an a little mysterious.
In California, the only place to find information about actual staff costs at the school site level is on a report known as the School Accountability Report Card (SARC). It's a dense document full of useful information for those intrepid few who actually find it and read it. Until the passage of the Federal ESSA law at the end of the Obama Administration, there was almost no way to get this information — it was a completely hidden area of inequity in school systems. (This issue is explained in greater depth in Ed100 Lesson 8.7.) Because SARC reports are not systematically collected or compared, there is little accountability for their quality.
Teachers miss work an average of about 9 days per school year, but the rate varies significantly among districts and data are not easy to find. The treatment of teacher absences can become part of the culture of a district. Teacher absences can involve training days, conferences, sick leave, personal days, and absences for other reasons.
Some teacher contracts unintentionally encourage teacher absences with "use 'em or lose 'em" clauses that blur the use of vacation days and sick leave. The cost of covering for a teacher's absences is a hidden area of compensation. A major study of teacher attendance in 2012 estimated the cost at about $1,800 per teacher per year (about $2,200 in 2022 dollars), again with big variances.
Teacher absences add up. Over the course of a K-12 education, an average student will cumulatively spend about two-thirds of a school year being taught by substitute teachers. The rate varies, though. In general, low-income students experience more teacher absences compared with their high-income peers.
California has a persistent shortage of people who want to work as teachers. The shortage is even more acute for substitute teachers.
It is very easy to qualify to work as a substitute teacher in California. Normally, you must have earned a four-year college degree, but in 2022-23 the shortage was judged so severe that a path was created for aspiring teachers to work in the classroom as paid substitutes. There's some minimal paperwork involved, but a full credential isn’t required.
Most substitute teachers are paid by the day, and the rate can vary wildly from one substitute "gig" to the next. Districts have some practical incentives to re-hire the same substitutes repeatedly, if they can. Districts often try to maintain a pool of candidates so that when a teacher calls in sick there's a clear list of people to call. Substitute teachers don’t have to accept every job offered to them — and they don’t. Schools with a reputation for treating substitute teachers well have a significant advantage over those with a poor reputation.
Prior to the pandemic, pay rates for substitutes tended to be about double the minimum wage. In the pandemic, rates rose sharply, and did not quickly return to pre-pandemic levels. In October 2023 most job listings for substitute teachers on EdJoin offered more than $200 per school day. When no substitute is available, students still need supervision. Lacking better options, administrators frequently find themselves standing in for absent teachers. Teacher can also make do by dispersing otherwise unsupervised students to other classrooms.
Search all lesson and blog content here.
Login with Email
We will send your Login Link to your email
address. Click on the link and you will be
logged into Ed100. No more passwords to
remember!
Questions & Comments
To comment or reply, please sign in .
Selisa Loeza October 22, 2021 at 11:18 pm
Jeff Camp October 5, 2018 at 10:43 pm
cb65dy89 May 2, 2016 at 5:19 pm
ptalisa April 28, 2015 at 5:57 pm
CM January 19, 2015 at 2:51 pm
Margaret Gaston March 29, 2011 at 4:53 pm
A 2007 survey of elementary teachers in the San Francisco Bay region conducted by the Lawrence Hall of Science found that 41 percent of respondents felt less prepared to teach science as compared to other subjects, yet more than two-thirds said they had fewer than seven hours of professional development in science education over the last three years. More than a third said they received none at all.
In dynamic environments where students and teachers are more likely to thrive, attention is paid to building subject matter content knowledge and pedagogical skills, developing solutions to tough problems by encouraging collaboration between and among teachers, and using student data and other relevant assessment information to guide instruction and shape professional development. Building capacity of the teacher workforce to meet everyday classroom challenges may not have the drawing power – or the drama – of other currently popular approaches, but it is a strategy that deserves equal play if we want to bring about the increases in students’ learning that Californians would like to see.