Which school do you want to support?
Where a child attends school usually depends on where he or she lives. California is organized into about a thousand school districts. These vary from tiny, rural districts serving only a handful of students to sprawling urban districts. Los Angeles Unified School District, America’s second-largest, serves about two-thirds of a million students. It is so large that the state's PTA treats it as four districts.
In any district large enough to have more than one school serving a grade level, the question of which children go to which school is automatically a matter of great interest. Parents will go to great lengths to get their kids into the school they believe will best serve them. Usually, school assignments are determined by your address: a map defines school attendance areas, and you go to school where the map says you go to school. Don't like it? Those with the means to do so will move. Those who cannot afford to move sometimes lie about their address, even at the risk of being sent to jail for it. Can your child attend school near your place of employment? Maybe, if you're a live-in nanny. Homeless? There are rules for that, too.
Where do you live?
Your zip code, please!
Five digits give
California is a very diverse state, but its ethnic, racial and economic diversity looks more impressive on paper than in person. Many communities are not diverse at all. Schools within a district are usually organized into “attendance areas” whose boundaries guide school assignment decisions. Former California State Senator Gloria Romero refers to zip codes as "five digits of separation." Assignment may also be determined by lottery, by ranked choice, by test scores, or by complex hybrid solutions defined at the district level.
The role of race in school assignment has long been a matter of critical national concern. In 1954, the Supreme Court ruled in Brown v. Board of Education that to separate children in school “from others of similar age and qualifications solely because of their race generates a feeling of inferiority as to their status in the community that may effect their hearts and minds in a way unlikely ever to be undone.” The court held, therefore, that “separate” education was “inherently unequal.”
The Brown decision led to requirements that many school districts integrate the schools within their boundaries. In some large districts such as Los Angeles, this required busing to bring children to schools outside their own neighborhood. Remnants of this requirement still remain in Los Angeles and many other California districts, in the form of targeted funds that were once used for school transportation (now known as Targeted Instructional Improvement Block Grant, or TIIG).
Over time, additional court decisions and voter initiatives (particularly proposition 209, passed in 1996) ended court-ordered busing and disallowed the use of race as a factor in determining school assignment. The end of busing did not signal the end of racial isolation, which by some measures has grown worse according to Segregating California's Future, a 2014 report from the Civil Rights Project at UCLA. For a good summary of recent Federal civil rights rulings related to education see the UCLA Civil Rights Project documentation of McFarland v. Jefferson County Public Schools & Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 (PICS)
Because poverty and poor school results tend to go together, many of the state's lowest-performing schools are located in its poorest zip codes. The Open Enrollment Act is intended to provide students with a way out: the law requires that students enrolled in the state's 1,000 lowest-scoring schools be permitted to transfer to a higher-scoring one in their district or in another district, if there are open desks.
Social science indicators of poverty, well-being, educational attainment and more are notoriously correlated with zip code. Organizing school enrollment strictly by geography is not the only option. One of the major school reform themes of recent decades has been the idea that families should have choices about where their children attend school.
Not every student attends the school nearest home. The next lesson will explore school choice.
Search all lesson and blog content here.
Not a member? Join now.
or via email
Already Joined Ed100? Sign In.
or via email