Which school do you want to support?
It is easy to think of truancy as a law enforcement issue — a problem of willful teenagers.
But most "truancy" is better thought of as "absenteeism" or just students who miss school. School is compulsory for children in California beginning in first grade, but huge numbers of elementary school children miss an awful lot of school. The reasons are generally mundane. Parents or caregivers fail to get them to school for all sorts of reasons.
Children who miss school can fall behind quickly, and schools are generally not equipped to support family interventions that can make a difference. Parents have a legal responsibility to get their kids to school. Enforcement of attendance is a common area of cooperation between municipalities and school districts.
The school system in California is set up to take attendance very seriously because early absenteeism predicts later problems, including failing to graduate high school. Districts need to address absenteeism early and often.
Most kids never miss school, or miss it rarely. When districts focus on improving attendance, as a practical matter they need to focus on students or groups of students who miss school the most, especially in early grades. To help drive focus on this issue, in 2018 California began collecting data about chronic absenteeism in grades K-8 for the California School Dashboard. You can read much more about that in our blog post on Attendance and Absenteeism.
The school finance system in California has been designed with a powerful incentive to keep students in school: it funds school districts on the basis of Average Daily Attendance (ADA), rather than on the number of students enrolled. This is also a part of the reason why schools take attendance every day. Districts take this very seriously. Most states base funding on enrollment, not attendance — California is one of only a handful of states that enforce attendance through the school finance system.
Because attendance directly affects school district finances, districts have a big incentive to boost it. Investments that increase attendance can pay for themselves quickly if they work. For example, effective attendance-management systems enable school office staff to call parents of absent students by lunchtime.
In 2017-18 about 400,000 California students were are chronically absent, meaning they miss school more than three weeks of the school year. This level of absence from school correlates with all kinds of bad outcomes, including failure to finish high school. According to a 2016 report of the State Attorney General's office, 82% of those in prison in America are high school dropouts.
To find out the absence rate in your school district, check this database from EdSource. Chronic absenteeism data is also available on the California Department of Education (CDE) DataQuest Web site. The reports indicate chronic absenteeism rates of schools and school districts and which student subgroups have the highest chronic absenteeism rates.
California's strict attendance rules are a hardship for student organizations and athletic groups. For example, even students that serve on school boards or as advisors in school accreditation teams need permission to attend meetings during school hours. School districts receive funding based on attendance; in 2018 each missed day, regardless of the cause, cost the district about $75.
In 2020 the pandemic threw a giant wrench into the connection between funding and attendance. Suddenly, the driving priority was no longer physical attendance, but online engagement. Huge numbers of students lacked access to a computing device or the internet. Even in normal times, students in poverty or living in rural areas tend to miss school at a higher rate, which in turn suppresses school funding in those areas. Attendance was designed into California's education finance system in the middle of the 20th century. In the context of the pandemic, leaders began re-evaluating a long-discussed change to using enrollment-based funding formulas, as a majority of states do.
For older students, sometimes missing school is a result of their behavior. Out of school suspensions and expulsions are a tool that schools use to punish students and maintain order in schools. However, these disciplinary approaches also keep kids from learning, especially those kids whose achievement is of the greatest concern.
Johnny's not in class
a canary in the mind
empty chairs can pass
a silent warning sign
The California Endowment has been a leading voice in creating a movement to find other ways to address student misbehavior. They argue that suspensions are largely counterproductive, and that it is better to "suspend" students in a way that keeps them in a learning environment. A study of school suspension practices by the ACLU in 2018 found that students in America miss about 11 million days of school annually due to suspensions. The rate of suspensions is significantly lower in California than in other states, but varies by county.
Parents and PTAs can help get kids to class on time and not miss school. From creating a regular bedtime routine to making sure backpacks are ready to go in the morning, time-proven strategies really work, if parents know about them. Attendance Works provides useful web-based handouts for pre-school, elementary, middle and high school in several languages.
This lesson concludes the Ed100 coverage of the topic of Time as a lever for educational success. This is a good moment to reiterate the organizing framework of Ed100: Education is Students and Teachers spending Time in Places for Learning with the Right Stuff in a System with Resources for Success. So Now What?
The next series of lessons picks up the topic of places for learning, including primers about neighborhood schools, charter schools, and learning beyond the classroom.
Updated July 2017, Dec 2017, Jan 2018, Oct 2018, June 2019, May 2020.
Search all lesson and blog content here.
Login with Email
We will send your Login Link to your email
address. Click on the link and you will be
logged into Ed100. No more passwords to
remember!
Questions & Comments
To comment or reply, please sign in .
Jamie Kiffel-Alcheh November 5, 2019 at 2:58 pm
Anoush Voskanian November 20, 2019 at 4:37 pm
Susannah Baxendale January 17, 2019 at 1:09 pm
Jeff Camp August 23, 2018 at 10:49 pm
Susannah Baxendale January 17, 2019 at 1:13 pm
nkbird August 9, 2018 at 5:10 pm
Carol Kocivar May 20, 2018 at 2:46 pm
Can a Few Simple Letters Home Reduce Chronic Absenteeism? New Research Shows They Can
Read it here here
Jeff Camp - Founder March 28, 2018 at 5:58 pm
Carol Kocivar December 6, 2017 at 11:39 am
Learn more in this article from EdSource:
https://edsource.org/2017/state-releases-data-on-chronic-absenteeism-to-help-flag-students-at-risk/591243?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email
Carol Kocivar December 5, 2017 at 11:15 am
"As districts across the country try to drive down absenteeism, New York City leads the way'"
https://www.chalkbeat.org/posts/ny/2017/11/30/as-districts-across-the-country-try-to-drive-down-absenteeism-new-york-city-leads-the-way/
Carol Kocivar October 27, 2016 at 2:55 pm
Attendance: A Measure of School Success
Missing just two days of school in a month is a key warning sign for trouble. Yes, there are some things your school can do about it.
https://ed100.org/blog/Attendance-Success
Carol Kocivar October 27, 2016 at 2:48 pm
In School + On Track 2016
"An estimated 210,000 K-5 students in California are chronically absent – missing 10% of the school year – making up 7.3% of elementary school students in the state."
"Chronic absence rates are disproportionately high for certain groups of students and are concentrated in a small number of schools and districts:
• 77% of all chronically absent students are low-income
• The chronic absence rate for African American students (14%) is 2X the rate for all students
• 50% of chronically absent students in our sample attend 20% of schools and 10% of districts; 25% attend 7% of schools and 3% of districts."
"In 2013, just over half of districts surveyed said they tracked student attendance data over time. In 2016, 85% of districts reported that they do."
Find the report here: http://oag.ca.gov/truancy/2016.
Carol Kocivar June 10, 2016 at 4:14 pm
An inter-active web resource from the US Department of Education takes a close look at which groups of students are more likely to be chronically absent. The data is drawn from nearly every public school in the country and helps us understand who is chronically absent, at what grade levels chronic absenteeism tends to occur, and how chronic absenteeism compares community-by-community and state-by-state.
http://www2.ed.gov/datastory/chronicabsenteeism.html#intro
Jeff Camp - Founder February 5, 2016 at 1:31 pm
Santa Ana Unified School District (one of the CORE districts) has begun experimenting with ways to improve attendance, which is reported on the district's School Quality Improvement Index. (Yep, it's really called the "squee".) The district began operating a Saturday School for chronically absent students to make up for days missed. The curriculum for Saturday School is evolving: the point is to increase the chance that students at risk will decide that school is worth showing up for. Data in the SQII will help to evaluate the program's effectiveness.
Carol Kocivar December 5, 2015 at 11:24 am
The California Attorney General’s Office has created suggestions for school districts for inclusion in their LCAP's to address attendance and chronic absence issues.
https://oag.ca.gov/sites/all/files/agweb/pdfs/tr/ago_sample_lcap.pdf
Stacey W April 6, 2015 at 8:50 pm
Tara Massengill April 27, 2015 at 9:06 am
aimeef23 April 27, 2015 at 4:09 pm
JH McConnell October 19, 2015 at 11:25 pm
cnuptac March 22, 2015 at 6:44 pm
JH McConnell October 19, 2015 at 11:08 pm
Rob M April 10, 2011 at 8:11 pm
Having the state create incentives for districts to focus energy on increasing attendance is important. At the same time, the state’s finance system will need to focus on more more than just seat time for schools to be able to take advantage of new learning opportunities such as distance learning or self-paced learning. In the end what we care about is how much students learn, not whether they have lots of seat time. This will be a difficult policy balance to retain the important focus on attendance while allowing districts to experiment with alternative methods of instruction.
JH McConnell October 19, 2015 at 11:18 pm
There is some truth, however, that students who are not going to school may resist going to school because they are not doing well there. In that case not going to school is an indicator of an existing problem, and not the cause of the problem. The cause of the problem may very well be inadequate or ineffective teachers or sub-standard instructional material.
Jeff Camp - Founder October 20, 2015 at 9:58 am
Lisette October 3, 2017 at 4:30 pm