The public education system is designed to serve all students, without exception. Both federal and state laws define and protect this mission.
Disabilities that affect learning are common. About one student out of six in the US formally qualifies for some form of help to support their learning needs. This ratio has increased over time.
This lesson of Ed100 explains why special education services are needed, who receives help, who provides it, and who pays for it. This lesson also explores the rights of students and families, and how parents can support their kids with special needs. Special education is a big part of the education system, and there’s a lot to know!
Some forms of disability are easy to describe, like deafness, blindness or mobility issues. But most common challenges, including dyslexia, dyscalculia, and autism, require time and expertise to diagnose. The majority of students who qualify for special education services either have a speech impairment such as stuttering or a learning disorder such as dyslexia.
Parents: You are your child's most important advocate.
Parents: you should think of it as your job to figure out if your child needs help, and the earlier the better. Let your teacher know as soon as possible if your child is struggling or you suspect a disability. You are your child's most important advocate, and it can be a complex role. Learning disabilities can be very specific, so they can be easy to miss. Unfortunately, many students are not identified quickly enough for early intervention.
What is dyslexia?Probably the most common learning disability is dyslexia, “a specific learning disability characterized by difficulties in word reading and/or spelling that involve accuracy, speed, or both.” As much as a fifth of humanity has some form of dyslexia, mostly undiagnosed. Specific disabilities aren’t necessarily associated with general intelligence. For example, Gavin Newsom, the governor of California (2019-27), is known for his deep command of budget details. He is famously candid about the fact that he has dyslexia, which was undiagnosed until early adulthood. He co-wrote a children’s book for families facing similar challenges.
Because reading challenges often go unnoticed, the state of California took an important step in 2023 by committing to routinely screen all students in grades K-2 for risks of dyslexia and other reading issues so that teachers can help students address them. Compared to other states, California was a latecomer to this policy, which was implemented in 2025-26. Screening tools were developed for both English-speaking and non-English-speaking students.
For decades, students were taught to read using a whole language approach. It was demonstrably disastrous, particularly for students with dyslexia. Change is hard, even when policies shift and the evidence is clear. California has struggled to help teachers shift to approaches that work better, including foundational reading skills such as phonological awareness, phonics, word recognition, and fluency.
What is Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)?A growing number of children, disproportionately boys, have a disability in a broad category known as Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), which affects behavior, communication, and interaction with others. Some people with severe autism require considerable support. Others who are “on the spectrum” can be very high-functioning or brilliant. Elon Musk famously revealed that he has Asperger’s Syndrome, a form of ASD, in his opening monologue for Saturday Night Live in 2021.
Many students on the ASD spectrum have difficulty “reading” others. They are disproportionately involved in bullying incidents, usually but not always as the victim.
What is ADHD?About a tenth of children aged 3-17 years have a current diagnosis of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), which interferes with a child's capacity to consciously choose and control where they direct their attention. The hyperactive flavor of ADHD tends to particularly concern educators because students can distract others and complicate efforts at classroom control, especially in large classes. Boys are nearly twice as likely to have this diagnosis as girls. Roughly half of students diagnosed with ADHD take prescription medication to manage symptoms.
Other issuesMany other disorders and challenges can interfere with education, such as anxiety, depression, and trauma. But for now let's move to the next step: When a parent or educator suspects that a student has a disability that interferes with their education, how are schools meant to respond?
Schools are obligated under law to provide special support for students who are identified as needing it. In education lingo, the term for this kind of help is accommodations and modifications. In California in the 2025-26 school year, special education services were provided to 883,862 students in K-12. Services are available in a variety of settings, including regular classrooms, classrooms that emphasize specially designed instruction, day-care, preschool, the community, and the work environment.
Early identification and support for struggling students is essential, but how does that actually happen?
In practice, most learning disabilities are first spotted by parents or by elementary school teachers in regular classrooms. Establishing whether a child is eligible for special education services requires a process. School counselors can help enormously in schools fortunate enough to have them. With the permission of parents, psychologists assess a student to help determine if the child is eligible for special education. After that, the psychologist works with the classroom teacher and other professionals to determine what services the child needs.
Sometimes the required help can be provided by teachers, such as allowing a student extra time to complete work. In other cases, the student needs more expertise, such as help from a psychiatrist. A necessary early step is an evaluation to determine whether the student is eligible for Special Education or a 504 plan.
|
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) |
|---|
|
Commonly known as Special Education, the federal IDEA law governs how states and public agencies provide early intervention, special education, and related services to about 8 million eligible infants, toddlers, children, and youth with disabilities nationally. The law has been extensively amended since its first version in 1975. A major provision of this law requires annually updated Individualized Education Plans (IEPs) for qualified students. |
|
Section 504 |
|
Named after a provision in the federal Rehabilitation Act of 1973, “Section 504” is a civil rights law that, among other things, prevents discrimination in access to education due to a disability. Who may be eligible for extra help? Examples include students with a physical or mental impairment that may interfere with a “major life activity” like reading, walking, concentrating, speaking, or breathing. Think asthma or an illness like arthritis. Even students who earn good grades may be eligible. |
Each of these laws has separate eligibility requirements. A student who is not eligible for special education may be eligible for a 504 plan. Yes, this is part of the reason why some parents become education policy nerds. Check this useful summary that lays out the differences.
The special education system in California is notoriously complex, and in 2015 a task force set out to reform it with a vision of One System to serve all students. The report is of historical interest as evidence of how difficult it is to change a big system.
Practical advice
If your child needs special education services, it can be very helpful to keep good records including things like contact information, notes from meetings with teachers, and report cards. For guidance about what good notes look like for a parent of a student with a disability or disorder, read this post from Understood.org.
Students with disabilities are included in annual state testing. Students can be given extra time or other accommodations, such as having the test read to them, so they can participate in and complete the test. Some students take a different test, the California Alternate Assessment (CAA). See Lesson 9.3 for more.
Under special education law, all students are general education pupils first, including those with disabilities. Inclusion in general education classrooms should be considered the first setting for all pupils, and a student with exceptional needs should be removed from the regular classroom only if education in the regular classes with supplementary aids and services cannot be achieved satisfactorily. This idea is commonly referred to as placing a student in the least restrictive environment. Of students with disabilities, about two-thirds are taught in general education classrooms for at least 80 percent of the school day.
In 2022, research at Indiana University confirmed that the best way to serve students with disabilities is in general education — not siloed in special education classrooms:
“Students with disabilities spending 80% more time in inclusive classrooms did better in reading and math than peers spending more time in special education classrooms.”
The term Universal Design originated in architecture, with the idea that everyone benefits from well-designed buildings that can provide access to all. In education, the concept is extended to learning: design instruction in ways that work for all students, and permit students to show their understanding in different ways.
The 2015 Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) mentions this approach using the term Universal Design for Learning (UDL). The big idea is to shift the focus from fixing the student to fixing the curriculum, proactively removing barriers so that teachers can support students with varying needs in the same classroom. ESSA did not attach new funds or incentives to the UDL approach, but its use of the term raised its profile. Critics of UDL argue that there is little evidence to support it.
A cloud of evolving terminology surrounds the overlapping ideas about how to address students' learning needs. Everyone learns a little differently. For some, learning a melody is easy, but mastering a math concept is hard. For some, math clicks but names are hard to remember. Some teachers use the term learning differences in order to include everyone in discussion of how students might need support in flexible ways.
School districts and charter schools are obligated under federal law to provide a Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) to all students. In 1979 Congress created the U.S. Department of Education, abbreviated either as DOE or ED, partly to enforce this obligation through an Office for Civil Rights (OCR). This office collected data and used litigation as a strategy to enforce laws against discrimination in access to education.
In his 1980 campaign for president, Ronald Reagan opposed the formation of the DOE and the extension of civil rights to education partly on the basis that it created “reverse racism.” In 2026, the Trump Administration moved toward disbanding the DOE administratively by transferring its responsibilities to other agencies and cutting funding for them. Enforcement of civil rights in education became a function of the Department of Justice (DOJ), alongside the FBI and DEA.
If students don't receive the help they are due, they can file a complaint and sue their school district for damages. It happens, and the fact that it happens is part of what makes the complaint system effective.
As of 2026, about one student out of six in public education receives some kind of special education accommodation. The major categories of special education services provided vary by age:
Overall, about one-fifth of California’s current K–12 operating spending goes to special education according to a prominent study in 2026. The amount spent on special education in California is not based on a formula. Students who need special education services have a right to them, and districts must provide them. The state and the federal government provide support to districts for this purpose, as we will discuss. But there is not a formula.
The cost of providing special education accommodations has risen over time, driven in significant part by increasing rates of severe autism. In late 2019, the California Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO) delivered an overview of special education systems to provide lawmakers with high-level policy guidance. Ed100 extended the LAO findings in 2026:
According to an analysis by the LAO, the average annual cost of educating a student with disabilities is almost triple the cost to educate a student without disabilities, with enormous variation:
“Federal and state funds specifically for special education don't fully cover the costs. Local funds cover the gap, which varies each year.”
School districts have a mandate under federal and state law to serve all of their students, including those who require special education. In recognition of this mandate, both the federal and state governments commit funds each year specifically for special education.
These federal and state funds don't fully cover the costs, and school districts pay the remaining portion locally. The unreimbursed portion is sometimes called encroachment, a term that irritates families whose children have special needs. The accounting term encumbrance is somewhat better.
In the 2026-27 budget, California increased special education funding by $2.4 billion to reduce this encumbrance. Not adjusted for inflation, it was a 43% increase from the 2025 Budget Act. The new funds were substantially marked for distribution through SELPAs (see below), which should expedite getting the funds where they are needed efficiently.
California’s state funding model, LCFF, doesn't include special education.
In California, money is allocated to school districts based on some student attributes, but disability status is not among them. In effect, California’s system assumes that students with special needs are evenly distributed among the general population. The logic of this policy is to avoid creating incentives to label kids, but it’s a flawed assumption with an unequal impact.
Additionally, the policy creates a bittersweet problem for schools that do a great job of educating students with disabilities. If their success becomes well known, eventually they will attract more families that want a great program for their kids. Money for special education does not follow the student, so a school can become a victim of its own success.
What's a SELPA?
To help mitigate these financial impacts, and also to create some economies of scale for uncommon and high-cost disabilities such as blindness, the state distributes disability funding through a regional network of Special Education Local Planning Areas, or SELPAs. State law requires that every school district, county office of education, and charter school belong to a SELPA. Most of the state's largest school districts have their own SELPA; smaller districts join together and negotiate the use of funds for students.
The SELPA system has many critics. A steady parade of reports has called for changes, so far without result, but the direction seems serious. In 2026, the system was a focus of study for the Getting Down to Facts III project and the state legislature considered a bill to create an independent council that would craft recommendations by 2030, probably drawing on the study. For information about policy changes as they come, or don't, subscribe to EdSource. It's free.
Counselors play essential roles in Special Education. School counselors are trained to recognize developmental concerns and mental health risk factors and to provide counseling. They also help identify students who should be assessed to determine if they are eligible for special education support. Teachers or counselors acting alone cannot qualify a student for special education services; eligibility is determined through a formal evaluation and team process. It can get complicated.
Once upon a time, most schools in California had counselors.
Today, California schools make do with some of the worst levels of counseling support in the nation. The state’s data system for transparency about staffing in schools, DataQuest, conceals counselor data under a combined count of pupil services personnel, a mishmash category that includes counselors, social workers, nurses, occupational therapists, and many other professions.
Luckily, the federal government obligates most school districts to disclose some details about student/counselor ratios. Based on this source, it’s possible to estimate that something north of a third of pupil services employees in the state are counselors. An analysis by Ed100 in 2026 suggested that student/counselor ratios have probably improved over the past decade, both in California and in the country as a whole:
Even with this improvement, California students still have very poor access to counselors. Few states have invested in school counselors sufficiently to reach the average caseload ratio of 250:1 recommended by the American School Counselor Association.
California’s scarcity of school counselors may play a part in the state's relatively low rate of identification of students qualified to receive special education services. If a tree falls in the forest and no one is there to hear it, does it qualify for special education?
“Gifted” does not fall into one of the 13 classifications of special education. However, being gifted does not disqualify a student from special education or 504 services. These children are referred to as twice exceptional.
Unfortunately, a child's giftedness may mask a disability, or, in reverse, the child’s disability may mask the child’s giftedness. Because of a disability, a gifted student may be thought of as lazy or struggling. More on this subject in the Ed100 blog.
The special learning needs of gifted students are frequently overlooked. Some school districts set aside money to create programs or services for them, but there is no special funding in California to do so. Learn more about gifted students in the Ed100 blog.
This lesson was last updated in July 2026.
Search all lesson and blog content here.
Login with Email
We will send your Login Link to your email
address. Click on the link and you will be
logged into Ed100. No more passwords to
remember!

Questions & Comments
To comment or reply, please sign in .
Carol Kocivar July 20, 2026 at 11:10 am
In the Ed100 blog
Special education costs flood school budgets
In the 2026-27 budget, California stepped up to this challenge with a $2.4 billion increase in special education funding — a 43% nominal increase from the 2025 Budget Act.
Carol Kocivar April 12, 2025 at 8:01 pm
"The IDEA, a landmark law passed in 1975, guaranteed children with disabilities access to free public education. Still, schools are struggling with funding as Congress has never met the goal of covering 40% of the extra costs. Funding now covers just 10%, prompting calls for more federal support."
Jeff Camp - Founder October 25, 2023 at 7:49 am
Jeff Camp - Founder February 24, 2023 at 3:06 pm
Carol Kocivar January 9, 2023 at 4:00 pm
One size does not fit all – inconsistent effects of inclusion on learning and psychosocial adjustment of children with special needs. Many disability advocates disagree .https://hechingerreport.org/proof-ponts-new-research-review-questions-the-evidence-for-special-education-inclusion/?utm_source=The+Hechinger+Report&utm_campaign=356ffc7a83-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2023_01_06_07_46&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_-356ffc7a83-%5BLIST_EMAIL_ID%5D
Carol Kocivar August 4, 2022 at 12:55 pm
The special education base funding now calculated at the local level, rather than the SELPA level.
Increased ($14 million on going) and consolidated extraordinary cost pools.
Beginning in 2023-24, allocating Educationally Related Mental Health Services funding directly to local educational agencies rather than to SELPAs.
Developing addition to Local Control and Accountability Plan to support inclusive planning and promote cohesion between special education and general education planning.
Focusing a special education IEP best practices, and establishing an expert panel to continue the work of creating a model IEP template.
Establishing a pathway to a diploma for students who take the California Alternate Assessment and providing resources to identify alternative coursework options for students with disabilities to demonstrate completion of the state graduation requirements.
Carol Kocivar August 4, 2022 at 1:01 pm
Carol Kocivar June 14, 2022 at 12:47 pm
December 17, 2021 - This brief provides background on the state’s current funding allocation formula for special education, describes funding formulas used in other states, establishes a framework for evaluating these formulas, and offers some issues for the Legislature to consider.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2021/4486/spec-ed-funding-models-121721.pdf
Carol Kocivar June 5, 2022 at 3:26 pm
Important findings that " on average, states with proportionally larger populations of children and children living in poverty, children identified for special education, and non-White and Black children receive fewer federal dollars, both per pupil and per student receiving special education.
https://www.edworkingpapers.com/sites/default/files/ai22-578.pdf
Carol Kocivar May 14, 2022 at 1:56 pm
https://www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/us-department-education-announces-intent-strengthen-and-protect-rights-students-disabilities-amending-regulations-implementing-section-504?utm_content=&utm_medium=email&utm_name=&utm_source=govdelivery&utm_term=
Sonya Hendren July 11, 2020 at 1:23 pm
afrinier February 16, 2020 at 11:35 am
DerekandRebeccasDad November 21, 2019 at 10:53 pm
Jamie Kiffel-Alcheh October 25, 2019 at 9:24 pm
Jeff Camp January 6, 2020 at 11:27 pm
Selisa Loeza October 22, 2021 at 9:14 pm
Carol Kocivar May 28, 2018 at 9:54 am
Read the Ed100 is brief
Carol Kocivar March 3, 2018 at 5:05 pm
History of Special Education Funding
Carol Kocivar January 14, 2018 at 10:45 am
"California currently provides early intervention services to more than 40,000 infants and toddlers with special needs. California’s system for serving these infants and toddlers involves three programs operated by two types of local agencies—schools and regional centers. Some parts of this system date back more than 35 years. During this time, the state has not regularly, or even periodically, evaluated this system. We undertook a comprehensive review and found California's bifurcated system results in notable service delays.
Read the Report:
Evaluating California's System for Serving Infants and Toddlers With Special Needs
Kenny May 9, 2018 at 11:33 am
Carol Kocivar September 19, 2017 at 11:43 am
(Note: the lesson was updated with this information)
Jeff Camp March 23, 2017 at 10:13 am
David Siegrist1 April 30, 2017 at 12:31 pm
Jeff Camp November 29, 2016 at 9:50 pm
As usual, EdSource boils it down: Under the recommendation, "State money for special education would be folded into the Local Control Funding Formula, completing [Governor] Brown’s goal of creating a unified funding system for all children."
Here's more about it:
PPIC report: http://www.ppic.org/main/publication.asp?i=873
Task Force recommendations: http://www.smcoe.org/about-smcoe/statewide-special-education-task-force/
EdSource summary: https://edsource.org/2016/send-special-ed-funding-directly-to-districts-not-regional-agencies-report-says/573361
Albert Stroberg May 1, 2016 at 6:12 pm
There may be a subset which really do improve & perhaps some who get nothing out of it. How do we identify those?
Jeff Camp - Founder April 28, 2016 at 11:39 am
kellysakir March 7, 2016 at 1:49 pm
Carol Kocivar November 14, 2015 at 10:58 am
1. Research:
Identifying children with dyslexia as early as first grade could narrow or even close the achievement gap with typical readers, according to a new study by researchers at the University of California, Davis, and Yale University. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/11/151102184216.htm
2. Dyslexia California Law 2015:
AB 1369 requires the superintendent of public instruction to develop program guidelines for dyslexia. These will describe the characteristics typical of students with dyslexia and outline strategies to address them. They are expected to include information to assist educators in distinguishing between characteristics of dyslexia and characteristics of normal growth and development. http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/15-16/bill/asm/ab_1351-1400/ab_1369_bill_20151008_chaptered.pdf
geecookie2011 April 18, 2015 at 7:53 am
I speak and come from a child who this is his desire to do to be part of and to go to school to truly and really learn. Notbe and feel limited.
Ms Helenmarie “Cookie” a mother of 4 with child living with DS T21 and other complications and a Grandmother of 4
amosmickey April 14, 2015 at 12:03 pm
Veli Waller April 3, 2015 at 9:36 pm
Mamabear March 19, 2015 at 5:19 pm
Carol Kocivar - Ed100 March 12, 2015 at 12:11 pm
The report recommends changes to seven parts of the educational system:
• Early Learning
• Evidence based schools and classroom practices
• Educator participation and professional learning
• Assessment
• Accountability
• Family and Student Engagement
• Special Education Financing
For more information, go to: http://www.smcoe.org/about-smcoe/statewide-special-education-task-force/
Brandi Galasso March 5, 2015 at 7:31 am
jenzteam February 27, 2015 at 10:18 am
RE bullying and counselors - I feel our school is great at addressing both. HOWEVER - that said, we only have 600 kids at our school. Not 4000 like the other public school we could have chosen. These high school numbers are insane and I would have home schooled if putting our son in a school with 4000 kids was my only option.
Sherry Schnell January 22, 2015 at 9:52 am
eastwestpa February 4, 2015 at 12:53 pm
jenzteam February 27, 2015 at 10:22 am