Which school do you want to support?
California’s powerful initiative process was added to the state constitution in 1911.
With money for enough signatures, your idea for change to California law or even to the California constitution can be placed on a statewide ballot.
In principle, the initiative process is about private citizens. In practice, collecting signatures that actually matter is directly a function of dollars. Virtually all signatures for successful initiative petitions -- over 90% of them -- are collected by paid signature-gatherers, who typically earn $1 to $3 for each valid signature on their clipboard. (Have you noticed how genuinely they smile when you sign?)
The signature collection cost of an initiative in California can be several million dollars.
Your name /
on that petition /
for the sake
of future scholars
just made / the earnest
extra dollars. Ask!
AB 857 (vetoed by Governor Brown in 2013) was one of several efforts to reduce the power of money to put an initiative on the ballot. This measure would have required at least ten percent of qualified signatures to be collected by volunteers.
The California Secretary of State provides directions for qualifying an initiative.
During the 2016 election season the Sacramento Bee featured a recorded phone call to signature gatherers with an update on the price being offered for signatures on various measures.
With a majority vote, initiatives can directly amend the state constitution, bypassing the legislative process. When lawmakers want to change the state constitution they also have to get voter approval. To walk in the weeds about the difference between an initiative (which bypasses the legislature) and a referendum (placed on the ballot by the legislature) read here.
Initiatives have had an enormous impact on public schools in California. The most famous initiative was Proposition 13. Popular from the moment of its creation, Proposition 13 demonstrated the potential scope of initiative power in 1978. The main appeal of the measure was to limit property taxes but the net effect was to cut the level of school support that came from local property taxes and hand the control of school funding to the state.
In the years that followed Proposition 13′s passage, voters grew frustrated with falling school budgets, which they blamed on legislative failure. Another initiative, Proposition 98, promised to put a floor under funding for K-12 schools and community colleges. Prop 98 established a complex formula obligating the legislature to allocate a certain amount of the budget for the support of the education system. (See Chapter 8 for more on the effect of these propositions.)
Other initiatives have had enormous impact on education in California. For example:
In more recent years, Governors Arnold Schwarzenegger and Jerry Brown also made use of the initiative process. While Schwarzenegger was unsuccessful in gaining voter support for his desired reforms, Brown managed to get voters to raise state income and sales taxes in 2012 in order to stabilize the state budget with passage of Proposition 30, renewed as Proposition 55 in 2016.
These powerful governors turned to initiatives rather than the legislature because the legislative process had proved insurmountable. Important policy in this state is frequently enacted through the ballot. The dominant role of initiatives in California’s tortured education system has helped to prompt some thoughtful reflection about whether the initiative system is due for a tune-up. In 2013, the Public Policy Institute of California released a study that looked at public opinion about initiatives and made policy recommendations.
Initiatives, changes in law and other efforts don't arise spontaneously. The next lesson examines the ecosystem of organizations that variously support, inform, critique and cajole to create changes in the system.
Search all lesson and blog content here.
Not a member? Join now.
or via email
Already Joined Ed100? Sign In.
or via email