You Earned a Ticket!

Which school do you want to support?

Lesson 9.6

Achievement Gaps:
The System's Biggest Challenge

Are poor kids catching up in school, or falling further behind? The numbers say…

hero image

Some childhood gaps are welcome news, like that gap-tooth smile. Achievement gaps? Not so much.

What is an achievement gap?

California's student body is officially organized into groups by grade level, but it can also be organized into subgroups based on race, economic wellbeing, English language readiness and gender. Frustratingly stable patterns predict which subgroups of students tend to do better in school and which tend to do worse. These measurable differences, known as achievement gaps, are usually quantified using standardized test scores. Gaps in students' academic readiness can also be measured in other ways, such as graduation rates, college-going rates and course grades, but in the education system, test scores are the currency.

There are some good reasons to measure achievement gaps using standardized test scores. They are widely used and understood. They can reveal small differences or trends. They are comparatively quick and inexpensive. They also seem to correlate powerfully with variables that are harder to measure. Students with higher standardized test scores are more likely to persist in school, graduate, go to college and succeed there.

Poverty strongly correlates with test scores. Students who qualify for free or reduced-price lunch services (a common measure of poverty) tend to score lower on tests than the kids who don’t. Race correlates, too: on average, black and Latino students tend to score lower on standardized tests than white and Asian students do. Achievement gaps are a symptom of a deeper issue — opportunity gaps — where a lack of generational wealth in low-income communities, especially commnities of color, results in less educational opportunities for students. This term acknowledges systemic disadvantages to success.

How are achievement gaps measured?

Describing patterns of difference turns out to be more difficult than it might seem, even using test scores. After a student takes a standardized test like the CAASPP, California's state tests, a complex process grades the test using a scaled score. It's more than just counting the number of questions that you get right or wrong. Some questions are harder than others, so they are worth or weighted more than easier ones. Some questions are literally worth nothing because they are experimental.

A test score without context is meaningless, so test designers identify performance tiers, assigning benchmarks that indicate whether students have met expectations. California's system separates scores into four tiers.

Let's suppose that you and your twin sister each take a test, say the grade 5 CAASPP test in mathematics. Your sister scores 2,527 scaled points. You score 2,528—one point higher.

Your parents receive two envelopes in the mail with the score reports. Tearing open the first envelope, with warmth in their heart they learn that your score indicates "Standard Met." They open your sister's envelope, and the warmth fades. Alas, your sister's score falls short. It lands in the "Standard Nearly Met" range. (This is just an example — scores are anonymous.) When looking at the entire group of fifth grade students who are in the "Standard Met" group for math, we can't distinguish who barely made it into the group and who was one point away from being placed into the "Standard Exceeded" group.

Of course, the one-point "gap" between these hypothetical scores is insignificant from a statistical perspective. If you both retook the test, your scores would probably be similar but not the same. Like free throws in basketball, there's skill involved, but a bit of randomness, too.

Randomness becomes less important when small samples like this are combined in larger numbers. The close calls on either side of the line tend to cancel one another out. Unfortunately, the statistics show that there are some big gaps.

How big are the gaps?

They're big. Here's a comparison of CAASPP scores by subgroup for English Language Arts:

The gaps are big for math, too:

The gaps remained wide in 2017, a topic examined by the California Legislative Analyst in its brief for the 2018 budget. Analysis of achievement gaps in an ongoing topic in the California School Dashboard.

Are test scores improving?

Starting in 2002, the CST showed rising scores for 10 years, for all groups.

Yes. Over time, the long-term trajectory of California students' scores on standardized tests has been upward. Slowly but significantly, annual successions of students at each grade level are out-scoring their predecessors.

Scores on the CAASPP tests have risen modestly, but the tests have only been around for a few years. It's easier to see the long-term trend by looking at the test results on the California Standards Test (CST) that preceded it, which showed a steady pattern of rising scores across all groups of students in both English and math. For all subgroups, scores rose for ten years. According to California's state tests, scores have been rising over time for all groups of students. The improvement is corrovorated by rising graduation rates. The federal NAEP test shows long-term improvement, too. In recent years, however, the pattern of improvement has been less clear, as discussed in Lesson 1.6. The big picture answer is that throughout the decades, in the long term, the gap has shrunk significantly. In the last, say, ten years, it hasn't shrunk much... if at all.

Source: CA Department of Education Source: CA Department of Education Source: CA Department of Education. Click for additional detail

Have achievement gaps shrunk?

Are scores rising in a way that reduces achievement gaps? Tests scores for all subgroups have risen, as mentioned above, but the gap has not narrowed. According to EdSource and the Public Policy Institute of California, "achievement gaps persist and have widened in some cases." Looking short term, it's simply too tough to tell — the interaction between test scores and benchmarks confounds the analysis.

Even as scores have risen, achievement gaps have remained substantial — and they don't seem to be going away. The measurement of achievement gaps is so dependent upon where you place the goalposts that it is reckless analysis to measure the size of gaps using categories. The short answer to this question, then, is... it depends how you measure it (and over what time frame you are looking). Over the very long term, it's clear that more students, for example, have access to college. However, it's undeniable that the achievement gap still exists — and there are valid reasons for schools and districts to keep a careful eye on these patterns of achievement, so that they can do something about it. What can be done about it? EdSource launched an online conversation about it in 2015, inviting views about what should be changed. Spolier alert: it doesn't seem like there's a ready supply of easy answers.

It depends how you measure them.

However, demographics aren't destiny. One documented success of a school district in San Gabriel Valley shows promise. Latino students may score the second lowest out of all racial groups statewide, but at Covina-Valley Unified School District, Laatino students outperform them in standardized testing and graduation rates. The district began adopting a college mindset, heavily promoting higher education ot students as soon as kindergarten, and providing computer coding classes in elementary school. While the gap between Covina Valley's Latino students and the statewide white and Asian students still exists, the school district is taking big strides in modeling how schools can close the gap within their own classrooms. For more on college readiness and college access programs, see Lesson 9.4. On average, students tend to score in patterns, but these patterns conceal deeper truths, and there are always exceptions — proving that with the right tools, they can be disrupted.

When looking at any chart that compares "proficiency" rates, squint a little. Remember, individual scores are pesky, detailed things. A little bump can push a score over the cutoff line between one achievement category and the next. Cutoff points are defined by fiat—they are supposed to represent a standard of achievement, not a relative position within a curve.

By the nature of statistics, if a cut-off point stays put while a curve moves, metrics that describe how much of the curve falls above or below the cut-off point will highlight the significance of some changes while understating others. If the cut point is anywhere close to the steep part of the curve, a little bit of change can cast an exaggerated shadow. Education statistics are loaded with metrics derived from cut-off scores.

Bell curves have two tails, and some critics argue that reducing gaps by boosting the learning of kids at the bottom of the learning curve isn't enough. They argue that long-term American competitiveness requires that a school’s mission, should include focus on gifted kids at the top of the curve, too.

The success of California’s schools, districts, and public education system as a whole are often judged by how effectively they address these predictable gaps in achievement. The next lesson discusses the ways these systems’ successes are measured.

Updated September 2017, March 2018, August 2021, December 2021


Which ONE of the following is TRUE?

Answer the question correctly and earn a ticket.
Learn More

Questions & Comments

To comment or reply, please sign in .

user avatar
Carol Kocivar December 6, 2023 at 3:12 pm
College Readiness Report: Dec. 2023 Public Policy Institute

About 55% of students were deemed college ready in English in 2022–23, compared to 60% in 2016– Declines in math were similar, but levels of preparation are lower.

Demographic groups with historically lower college enrollment—Native American, Black, low-income, and Latino students, and students who have ever been categorized as English Learners (ever ELs)—were deemed ready for college-level math at lower rates than their peers.
Nearly two out of three Asian students (65%) were deemed ready, compared to 47% of Filipino students and 40% of white students.
user avatar
Jeff Camp - Founder November 16, 2023 at 12:36 pm
When we next update this lesson, we will include the growing gaps between girls and boys, who now lag in virtually every measure of achievement. For more, watch this TED talk by Richard Reeves.
user avatar
Carol Kocivar March 24, 2023 at 4:53 pm
Schools in states with mandates for gifted and talented education have higher rates of participation for English learners and students with disabilities in those programs, according to a 2023 paper from the Annenberg Institute at Brown University.
user avatar
Carol Kocivar July 5, 2022 at 2:42 pm
Research on ability grouping and tracking delivers the counterintuitive news that it is enriched classes that tend to have positive effects on student achievement. Remedial classes, on the other hand, don’t have a negative impact but don’t provide much benefit
either. University of Pennsylvania graduate school of education.

There are similar findings on providing enrichment /advanced opportunities especially for low income and students of color.
Research Deep Dive: What we know about gifted education
user avatar
Carol Kocivar June 14, 2022 at 1:21 pm
Narrowing California's K-12 Student Achievement Gaps. The 2020 report from the legislative analyst:
(1) examines data on K-12 student achievement gaps,
(2) identifies funding provided for disadvantaged and low-performing students,
(3) assesses existing state efforts to serve these students,
(4) develops options for better supporting these students.
user avatar
Jenny Greene August 12, 2020 at 4:43 pm
I volunteered during my daughter's 2nd grade computer class. It enlightened my understanding of schooling and the students in her class and their abilities. Once I was there when they were being tested for reading level. It was interesting to see how the test adapted throughout the hour. Some had long paragraphs to read through and select an answer about, while others may have only had a few sentences. At the end of the hour one boy literally had one sentence to read and answer a question about. He tried asking me for help with the vocabulary words; I was not allowed to help. Over the year I saw how far behind this student was; it was so discouraging. Lesson 9.2 said it is better to promote and provide supportive services, but from this experience I wonder if it's better to keep the child back until they understand the content of what they're studying. In this boy's case, I can't imagine it to be beneficial to promote him to third grade when he's already considerably behind his peers.
user avatar
Evan Molin February 22, 2018 at 5:25 pm
I believe the districts could use this information and data and allocate additional resources to schools in attempt to reduce this gap, and that would also result in test scores increasing.
user avatar
Sonya Hendren September 1, 2018 at 2:24 pm
That's one of the intentions of the Local Control Funding Formula introduced in 2013! (See Lesson 8.5) Districts get a base amount of money per student, plus 20% more for students with need (English learners, those in poverty or foster care) up to 55% of the district, and 50% more money above the base for students in need above 55% (to address the concentrated poverty.) Assigning the money by race would be illegal, but the achievement gaps based on poverty and English language learner status correlate well with the racial achievement gaps. We'll see how it works going forward.
user avatar
NATHANIEL CAUTHORN February 22, 2018 at 1:04 pm
I am not a fan of these standardized test. From what I can tell from the article (and please correct me if this is incorrect) these standardized test seem only to tell us that their is a gap, but tells us NOTHING about how to fix it! Why should students continue to take these test, that cause tons of stress and force teachers to spend the entire year preparing their students for one test to maintain funding, if all they are going to do is tell us that their is a problem that we now know about?
#sorrybutnotrealllysorry #@meifyoudare
user avatar
Grace Thomas February 22, 2018 at 8:33 am
Although standardized test scores are are difficult way to measure students academic skills because all student social tests differently, the test scores relating to race and poverty make sense to me because of their access to resources that will benefit their education. Thankfully the scores are raising, but ideally we'd like the patterns to change based on the correlations between race, poverty and scores.
user avatar
February 22, 2018 at 8:31 am
Would getting rid of standardized tests help?
user avatar
Emma Mechelke February 22, 2018 at 8:30 am
Achievement gaps divide and society loses a lot of potential talent in the process. Something needs to be changed.
user avatar
Brooklyn February 22, 2018 at 8:28 am
I wish there was an easy way to close this gap. I dont know why race is a factor in this.
user avatar
Abigail Hennessy February 22, 2018 at 8:26 am
Many of the charts focus on race rather than economic status, which I feel has a huge impact on the achievement gap. People with lower income often have less opportunities. Although I think all kids should receive fair chances to succeed, I believe there will always be an achievement gap because of the competitiveness installed in these children. If we help raise the scores of those who did not meet the standard, the kids who did meet the standard with also improve, leading to the same achievement gap and same gap in standardized test scores.
user avatar
VICTOR NGUYEN February 22, 2018 at 8:25 am
It’s good that scores are improving years later
user avatar
Connor Pargman February 22, 2018 at 8:24 am
I believe there are more factors that come with achievement gaps. I think teachers can be a big part of the problem. Let’s say a kid gets a unmotivated, lazy, and terrible teacher at a young age such as in 2nd grade. That teacher may affect the kids outlook on school and how much effort he puts into school the rest of his education.
user avatar
Gloria Lucioni January 6, 2019 at 10:34 pm
I agree some teachers and some students are not motivated.
user avatar
Hannah Symalla February 22, 2018 at 8:21 am
We need better programs to help kids do their best in school. Some children learn differently than others and we need to do our best to figure out how to accommodate for all the different ways of learning. Some kids also require more help or are slower learners. A majority of people are able to learn material, but the way teachers go about teaching it does not work for everyone, thus negatively impacting the child's testing and material actually learned and absorbed.
user avatar
Olivia Thomas February 22, 2018 at 8:12 am
There is a gap between the groups of races because of the poverty and money differences among them and their classes. While test cries have significantly risen throughout the years, the gaps between all the races are still very prevelant.
user avatar
g4joer6 April 22, 2015 at 11:38 pm
At the risk of making some people upset, I think the achievement gap exists because there are teachers who are unable to teach. This situation exists in affluent as well as in areas of poverty. If it weren't true, than why do we have 40 million Americans who can't read beyond a 3rd grade reading level?
user avatar
Sherry Schnell April 16, 2015 at 1:36 pm
Reducing the achievement gap is an important goal. But it isn't something that can or should be required of school districts. The achievement gap is a result of poverty and the environment in which a student lives - only a very small part of which is influenced by the school they attend. Reducing the achievement gap requires funds for housing, healthcare, good paying jobs for parents, perhaps substance abuse treatment for parents, etc, etc. Schools have funding for NONE of this. Schools aren't even adequately funded to educate the most well off students. Many schools have no librarian, music, art, books or even paper unless the parents pay for it.
user avatar
Jeff Camp - Founder January 16, 2015 at 10:02 am
An important provision of No Child Left Behind (NCLB) requires that each student be tested each year. Part of the motivation for this policy was to force schools and districts to notice patterns - achievement gaps - in the groups and subgroups of students that fall behind. (Presumably, noticing the gaps would help them to do something about them for the following year's students).
There are many perspectives on the purposes of testing students annually. Education statistical curmudgeon Bruce Baker argues that testing all students in search of statistical validity shouldn't be part of the motivation:
user avatar
sarah.chan April 4, 2015 at 9:43 pm
One of the biggest challenges is measuring achievement in students with severe disabilities. Even with the CAPA, it's hard to measure progress in students who remain at the lowest test level year after year.
user avatar
Gloria Lucioni January 6, 2019 at 10:39 pm
Some studies in lottery-based charters like KIPP might enlighten us all after ten or twelve years of developmental studies. I gather validity is about random samples and true experiments, but control groups are not usually ethical.
©2003-2024 Jeff Camp
Design by SimpleSend

Sharing is caring!

Password Reset

Change your mind? Sign In.

Search all lesson and blog content here.

Welcome Back!

Login with Email

We will send your Login Link to your email
address. Click on the link and you will be
logged into Ed100. No more passwords to

Share via Email

Get on Board!
Learn how California's School System works so you can make a difference.
Our free lessons are short, easy to read, and up to date. Each lesson you complete earns a ticket for your school. You could win $1,000 for your PTA.

Join Ed100

Already a member? Login

Or Create Account