You Earned a Ticket!

Which school do you want to support?

Lesson 7.2

The Feds:
Power to Provoke Change in Education

What power does the Federal government actually have over schools?

hero image

Updated May 7, 2017

Fed funding for education is small

People are sometimes surprised to learn that the federal budget only provides about 10% of the funding for public schools. In the first decade of the 2000's, federal requirements often seemed to dominate local school policies and decisions, in part because some of the funding came with new strings attached.

The federal budget provides about 10% of school funding.

During this period, the federal government became deeply involved in the quest to improve the performance of students and schools.

An important role of the federal government in education over the past few decades has been to collect data about schools’ achievements and shortcomings, and shine light on them. Another important role has been to provide incentives for experimentation that is then evaluated.

Goodbye, "No Child Left Behind"

NCLB made Federal funding "contingent"

The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) was created as a cornerstone of President Lyndon Johnson’s "War on Poverty." Title 1 ("Improving the academic achievement of the disadvantaged") is the most familiar program. The main function of ESEA was to provide extra support to schools that serve low-income children.

From 2002 to 2015, ESEA was amended and re-branded as the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). NCLB was a muscular policy; it made federal funding contingent on states adopting content standards, administering standardized tests in English and Math, and holding schools and districts accountable for the results of those tests.

NCLB established a romantic 12-year goal: By 2013-14, all students would score at a proficient level on state tests. It never happened. This goal was frankly impossible (for example, to have all English learners score proficient in English is by definition not achievable) but was deemed politically necessary. To have aimed lower than proficiency for all would have been unseemly.

Though passed as a bipartisan measure, NCLB eventually lost the support of both Democrats and Republicans as more and more schools fell short of the goal.

States were eager for relief from the provisions of NCLB, but congress was unable to forge a compromise to replace it. The law technically expired in 2007, but without a replacement it remained strangely alive, sort of. Like a zombie.

Federal money with strings attached

States, like mules / are stubborn blokes / so changing schools / requires some pokes

In 2008, state and local revenue sources for public education plummeted in the Great Recession. To prevent school systems from collapse, Congress quickly passed an economic stimulus package that included about $100 billion in federal funds for education. Most of these funds were delivered to states without significant strings attached, but about $4 billion was set aside for "Race to the Top," a set of competitive grants that encouraged districts to adopt specific policies in four areas:

As state leaders considered the federal "carrot" offered by the Race to the Top, they also faced a "stick." Massive numbers of schools and districts were failing to increase student test scores fast enough to meet the optimistic Annual Yearly Progress (AYP) targets established by NCLB.

Under the leadership of Secretary of Education Arne Duncan, in 2012 the Department of Education began working with states to apply for waivers to the outdated law in exchange for assurances that they would adopt specific policy changes. Virtually all states eventually applied for and received waivers. (The state of California itself did not apply, though a group of ten California districts including Los Angeles, the second largest district in the nation, applied independently.)

Hello "Every Student Succeeds Act" (ESSA)

At the end of 2015, the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) replaced NCLB. Passed with strong bipartisan support, the measure took effect in 2017-18.

ESSA moved the center of action for changes in the education system away from Washington. It requires that states identify their lowest-performing schools and take action to improve them. But it gives states lots of flexibility about how to identify those schools and what to do to help them.

Many fundamental ideas of NCLB remain. States must still:

  1. Target support for low performing schools and disadvantaged children. (California does this with the Local Control Funding Formula.)
  2. Administer assessments each year of students in grades three through eight, and once in high school, in math and English/language arts.
  3. Improve the quality and effectiveness of teachers, principals, and other school leaders.

The ESSA law runs over 1,000 pages, enough reading to keep you up many nights. To save you some time, the Alliance for Educational Excellence has created a series of videos on key areas within the Every Student Succeeds Act as well as side-by-side chart comparing accountability provisions in NCLB, NCLB waivers, and ESSA.

Other Federal Programs

The federal government continues to administer many other programs, including two huge ones that get less attention; child nutrition and special education. These federal programs are not affected by California's Local Control Funding Formula.

A lot of information (okay, an overwhelming amount of information) about federal education programs and initiatives is available at the U.S. Department of Education website. The department itself says its mission is "to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access."

The prior lesson explored the role of the state in education. This lesson explored the role of the federal government. The next lesson will be closer to home.

Updated May 7, 2017
to reflect the shift of power away from federal policy.

Review

What portion of California's K-12 education funding comes from the Federal budget?

Answer the question correctly and earn a ticket.
Learn More

Questions & Comments

To comment or reply, please sign in .

user avatar
Jeff Camp March 10, 2017 at 11:25 am
In 2017 the US congress further softened Federal accountability measures requiring student success in academic tests. The action placed further emphasis on state-level accountability policies.
user avatar
Carol Kocivar February 3, 2016 at 11:24 am
Got time for a webinar video on ESSA?
Leading education experts share their views on the "Implications of Every Student Succeeds Act for California and equity ".
http://edsource.org/2016/webinar-video-implications-of-every-student-succeeds-act-for-california-and-equity/93776?utm_source=Feb.+3+daily+digest+--+Sue&utm_campaign=Daily+email&utm_medium=email
user avatar
Mary Perry March 30, 2015 at 10:11 am
The news from Washington D.C. indicates that Congress may finally be getting serious about the long overdue reauthorization of ESEA (aka No Child Left Behind). Or maybe they aren't. It's been an "on again, off again" story for several months.
The action is long overdue and the delay has been frustrating. But perhaps the years of procrastination will end up with a more thoughtful approach to accountability than what we now have. This brief by two of the nation's leading education policy thinkers, Paul Hill and Linda Darling-Hammond, provides some hope. It's here: https://edpolicy.stanford.edu/publications/pubs/1324. These two are often on opposite sides of the political and philosophical divide regarding education, but they are apparently united in this advice to Congress.
©2003-2017 Jeff Camp
design by SimpleSend, build by modern interface

Sharing is caring!

Password Reset

Change your mind? Sign In.

Search all lesson and blog content here.

Sign In

Not a member? Join now.

or via email

Share via Email

Join Ed100

Already Joined Ed100? Sign In.

or via email