You Earned a Ticket!

Which school do you want to support?

Lesson 5.11

Small Schools:
Oops, We Shrunk the Schools!

Grants inspired a boom in “small” schools. Here’s what happened.

hero image

Getting "lost" in school

The largest schools in California enroll thousands of children. These complex organizations are larger than many corporations.

At their best, large schools offer diverse course options, robust athletic programs, specialized arts programs, and counseling support. For students with an edge, these large schools can work well.

For many students, however, it is easy to be overlooked in a big school, especially at the secondary level. If each course is taught by a different teacher, a student in such a school might interact with upwards of 150 students daily. In the course of a day, a teacher might be expected to sustain close to 200 relationships.

Shrinking the schools helped, some.

In the 1990s, education reform organizations — especially the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation — made huge donations to help school districts and charter schools create small schools. Research had suggested that small schools are systematically more effective than large ones at retaining students and advancing their academic progress.

The Gates’ leadership prompted a wave of small-schools reforms, partly aligned with the movement to create charter schools. This movement led to the creation of thousands of small schools all over America. (Small in this context is usually defined as 100 students per grade level or fewer.) In some cases, large schools were converted into multiple small schools sharing a campus, sometimes referred to as schools within a school models.

Some of these small schools, particularly newly-created schools, became important models for how to create an effective school culture.

In schools of
a smallish size
students can't
avoid your eyes

The early results were disappointing. In a letter in 2009, Bill Gates wrote that many of the schools they invested in “did not improve students’ achievement in any significant way". Just shrinking the sizes of schools did not appear to make as big a difference as hoped.

But he spoke too soon. A series of three follow-on studies published in 2010 by MRDC in New York City showed that graduation rates were higher by 10 percentage points or more in the city’s Small Schools of Choice (SSCs) than in other local high schools. In 2015, a further study led by Leanna Stiefel of NYU independently reinforced the MRDC finding: the movement to create new small schools probably boosted student outcomes in New York City.

Rigor and relationships

Why did the small schools work, and for whom? According to the third MRDC report, published in 2013:

“Principals and teachers at the 25 [small schools] with the strongest evidence of effectiveness believe that academic rigor and personal relationships with students contribute to the effectiveness of their schools. They also believe that these attributes derive from their schools’ small organizational structures and from the commitment, knowledge, dedication, and adaptability of their teachers.”

Small schools involve tradeoffs. For example, it is impractical for a small school to offer the range of courses and extracurricular activities possible at a large school. On the other hand, technology is constantly changing the conditions. Small schools may be able to offer students access to specialized learning opportunities through partnerships and external programs such as UC Scout. But managing such partnerships requires effort.

A principal can make or break a school

Perhaps the biggest challenge of a small schools is leadership. As discussed in Lesson 5.8, a principal can make or break a school, and effective principals are in short supply, especially in California. Making schools smaller implies finding and training more leaders. Generally, students are better off in a well-run big school than a badly-run small one. The tradeoffs are real.

Lesson 5.12 examines the ultimate small-school model: learning at home.

Updated July 2017
December 2018
July 2022
November 2022


Which ONE of the following is TRUE?

Answer the question correctly and earn a ticket.
Learn More

Questions & Comments

To comment or reply, please sign in .

user avatar
Robert Crowell May 4, 2018 at 9:16 am
As in all aspects of life, it is about relationships. If students feel valued, and part of a community they will do better.
user avatar
Jeff Camp - Founder September 17, 2017 at 12:24 am
Oakland has many small schools. Too many for its good, argues Gloria Lee of
user avatar
Angelica Manriquez February 29, 2016 at 5:14 pm
The school size doesn't matter what matters is the amount of students per classrooms and teachers per classroom.
user avatar
trckrnnr April 15, 2015 at 9:09 am
The school size would be fine if they staffed it better. 800 kids with a part time AP and no full time mental helper to deal with issue with students makes it very hard. I see student in the office sitting because their busted for something and the Sec are watching them and that is not with union rules
user avatar
Veli Waller April 8, 2015 at 4:46 pm
The elementary school that my sons attend has over 800 students. There is one principal and a vice principal for 3 days a week. It's too big! But, at the elementary level at least the teacher still has a relationship with the students. I fear what it will be like at our large middle and high schools.
©2003-2024 Jeff Camp
Design by SimpleSend

Sharing is caring!

Password Reset

Change your mind? Sign In.

Search all lesson and blog content here.

Welcome Back!

Login with Email

We will send your Login Link to your email
address. Click on the link and you will be
logged into Ed100. No more passwords to

Share via Email

Get on Board!
Learn how California's School System works so you can make a difference.
Our free lessons are short, easy to read, and up to date. Each lesson you complete earns a ticket for your school. You could win $1,000 for your PTA.

Join Ed100

Already a member? Login

Or Create Account