You Earned a Ticket!

Which school do you want to support?

Lesson 5.6

Private Schools

Private schools are changing, because…

hero image

Image: the garden path CC girl/afraid

Approximately 7% of California’s students in grades K-12 attend private schools. Of these students, about four out of five attend a private school affiliated with a church or religion. Many private schools (particularly those without a religious affiliation) refer to themselves as “independent schools” or "nonprofit schools." Statistics about class sizes, hours of instruction, staffing and the like are not systematically collected from private schools. Private schools generally use different tests than public schools do, so it is difficult to compare student achievement results between public and private schools.

Tuition is not tax-deductible

In California, as in most states, private school tuition is paid by parents, without significant government support or subsidy. Parents' private school tuition expenses are not generally tax-deductible. Non-tuition donations to private school scholarship funds are generally deductible, however, as private schools are almost universally non-profit organizations. (Some private schools refer to themselves as "non-profit schools" to emphasize the point.)  Private schools depend heavily on donations to support their capital requirements.

Blurred lines and Vouchers

Some students who attend private schools may receive services from a public school. For example students with special educational needs, say help with speech therapy, might receive those services through a local public school. Similarly, home-schooled students can also access some public school services.

Education historian and commentator Diane Ravich argues that charter schools should be viewed as a form of private school because charters are established through a contract ("charter") between a public entity (an "authorizer," such as a school district) and the governing board of the school, which is unelected.

In several states and Washington, DC, the lines between private and public schooling have been blurred through the use of "voucher" programs. In these programs, parents receive tax-funded vouchers for use toward payment of tuition costs at a private school. Because the majority of American private schools have a religious affiliation, debate about school vouchers frequently overlaps with arguments about separation of church and state. The debate goes back to at least 1875, the administration of Ulysses S Grant, when James G. Blaine proposed a constitutional ban on public funding of private schools. The Blaine Amendment narrowly failed to become a part of the US constitution, but most state constitutions adopted equivalent policies.

The matter is not settled. In 2002 a divided US Supreme Court approved the use of tax-funded vouchers for tuition in selective religious schools in limited circumstances in Cleveland.  In 2011 Republican leaders in several states including Indiana advanced state legislation to permit use of tax-funded vouchers at religious schools. In 1993, and again in 2000, voucher initiatives were overwhelmingly defeated in California.

With the arrival of the Trump administration in Washington, the voucher debate heated up again. New research (2016) from The Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education (SCOPE) takes a broad international look at how education systems with vouchers compare.

The study examines two approaches that it describes as "Public Investment" vs. "Privatization." For the "public investment" model, it describes Finland, Cuba, and Ontario, all of which invested significantly in teacher professionalization and resources for schools. The "privatization" examples are market-based reforms in Sweden, Chile, 1990s Ontario, and some U.S. cities. A 12-minute video, How Privatization and Public Investment Influence Education: A Look at the Research, takes a strong point of view in favor of the "investment" approach.

In the pro-voucher arena, The Foundation for Educational Choice provides arguments in favor of vouchers as well as selected research on programs on school choice in the US. The Wharton School provides voucher pros and cons with earlier state research. Arguments in favor of school vouchers are also well articulated by Greg Forster of the Foundation for Educational Choice here.

Arguments against vouchers are succinctly stated by the Anti-Defamation League. Rebuttals are summarized here by BalancedPolitics.org.

An excellent statistical comparison of different types of private schools (Independent, Catholic, Hebrew, etc. is available here from the blog schoolfinance101.

The next lesson explores ideas about improving education by incorporating health and other community-based services directly into schools.

Review

About 4 out of 5 private school students in California attend a school with a religious affiliation. Is their tuition tax-deductible?

Answer the question correctly and earn a ticket.
Learn More

Questions & Comments

To comment or reply, please sign in .

user avatar
Angelica Manriquez February 29, 2016 at 4:10 pm
Parents feel that their kids are safer in a private school. And they think teachers pay more attention to students.
user avatar
davidstephen72 August 26, 2015 at 9:36 pm
Public, private, charter? The most important factor is the "family" or the unit of people, who support the learning that is underway. Now, more than ever, with Common Core, families are complaining, "We can't help our kids...we don't understand the new ways."
Answer? Districts MUST provide Common Core Institutes for joint attendance by family members, students, and even community-at-large members.
user avatar
Jeff Camp - Founder October 8, 2014 at 12:07 pm
A persistent myth holds that teachers are twice as likely as other parents to send their kids to private schools. It isn't true. The myth appears to have originated in a 1983 study of urban Chicago schools that failed to compare households of similar income. The myth was recycled in a rather loose interpretation of a national survey in 2004, available here: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED485524.pdf To be clear, many households with teachers DO send their kids to private schools, especially in high-poverty urban areas. But they do so at a rate lower than neighboring households of similar income.
user avatar
davidstephen72 August 26, 2015 at 9:37 pm
Districts with declining enrollment should arrange for their employees, administrators, teachers, classified workers, and volunteers to enroll their own
children in the school district. Why not allow for special "bonuses" from the district's non-profit for doing so?
©2003-2017 Jeff Camp
design by SimpleSend, build by modern interface

Sharing is caring!

Password Reset

Change your mind? Sign In.

Search all lesson and blog content here.

Sign In

Not a member? Join now.

or via email

Share via Email

Join Ed100

Already Joined Ed100? Sign In.

or via email