You Earned a Ticket!

Which school do you want to support?

Lesson 5.8

Principals:
The Pivotal Role of Educational Leadership

The most influential person in a school is…

hero image

Leadership does not always spring to mind as a key element of the learning environment of a school. It should.

The Center for Teaching Quality (CTQ) has researched the impact of various “teaching and learning conditions” on student learning. The conditions researched include: facilities and resources, professional development, and school leadership.

According to the CTQ research, no other variable on this list has as powerful an effect on student learning as the school leader. Parents and teachers are the most immediate influencers of student learning results, but a great school leader can bring out the best in teachers and foster a great environment for learning. A poor leader, on the other hand, can destroy a school. Leadership matters.

California's school leadership crisis

This is very bad news for California, because it is uncommonly difficult to recruit principals in this state.

Under the best of circumstances, principals have a difficult job. In a small school, a principal oversees not just 400 students and some forty educators and staff, but also dozens of relationships with school district staff, parents, foundation staff, politicians, police, cranky neighbors, community leaders and leaders in other schools. The principal is also responsible for the school facilities, working with the district to provide for upkeep and remodeling when needed. All while conveying a loving openness and unflappable capacity to calm folks down when things aren't going the way they want.

In California, the circumstances for principals are far from ideal. For example, California ranks well below other states in the number of students per administrator. (See chart below.) These administrators, in turn, oversee teachers with some of America's largest classes.

California's school principals oversee more students than do those in other states.
It is uncommonly difficult to recruit principals in California.

What it mean to have fewer administrators in a school? As a practical matter, principals in California must do their job with one fewer leader in the office to help. The school district cannot fill the gap, either – districts in California have about half as many administrators as is typical in other states. To top it off, California’s relatively high salaries for teachers are not matched with similarly high salaries for principals. To recap: Leading a school is significantly harder in California than in other states, and it pays less.

According to an extensive study in 2018 as part of the Getting Down to Facts II project (GDTFII), California does not have a shortage of people with the right credentials to be principals. But it does have a shortage of people who want to be principals. About half of those who earned certificates of eligibility in 2010–11 to be a principal never obtained employment as administrators.

Principal turnover in schools is tremendously disruptive. It is also very common. Four years at a school is typical. According to a study in the GDTFII project, student achievement tends to fall after a principal leaves a school and it can take 5 years after a new principal is hired to fully rebound, particularly in high-poverty, low-achieving schools.

"Poaching" makes the equity problem worse

District superintendents tend to remain in a district for only a few years. In the time they have, one of their most powerful tools for change is to hire the best principals they can, increasingly by "poaching" promising leadership talent from other districts. According to the GDTFII study, "Principals have become more mobile in the last decade. In 2004–05, the typical California principal had been the principal at their current school for almost 10 years, compared to only 4 years in 2016–17."

Poaching makes sense as a hiring strategy, but of course it's a zero-sum game. It contributes to the churn in the system and tends to put less-well-off districts at a disadvantage. Schools with the greatest need tend to get less-experienced principals, and also tend to have relatively high principal turnover. It doesn't help that, according to the GDTFII report, principals of high-poverty and low-achieving schools report lower salaries than principals of other schools.

Building Leaders

There is ample evidence that effective school leadership really matters, and that training programs can be effective. Unfortunately, it is difficult for school districts to develop a "pipeline" of leadership talent. In 2018 the GDTFII study recommended that the state and districts should address this problem by developing principal leadership programs of "service scholarships and residency programs for school leaders," taking inspiration from programs in Tennessee and Chicago as well as from the California-based Aspiring Principals program.

Because leadership plays such a strong role in school success or failure, some nonprofit organizations focus on leadership development and placement, often recruiting principals from unconventional pools of talent. The Broad Residency emphasizes recruitment and training of school district leadership. New Leaders recruits and trains teacher leaders and principals. Both organizations, in turn, recruit extensively from Teach for America. These organizations (and many others) have developed thoughtful approaches to selecting and developing school leaders.

The GTDFII studies emphasize that investing in ongoing professional learning for educational leaders can have a significant effect for comparatively little cost: "One effective professional learning program estimated that the $4,000-per-candidate cost of the program equated to approximately $117 per additional student achieving proficiency."

How to pick a leader

If your school is looking to hire a new principal and you have been included in the search process, GreatSchools offers a list of interview questions to ask. The toughest type of questions, and sometimes most revealing, are simulation interviews in which you ask a candidate to play-act how they would handle a difficult leadership scenario.

While the most important elements of a work environment are human factors such as leadership, the more mundane physical considerations can also make a difference. The next lesson will explore these considerations.

Updated May 2018, October 2018.

Review

Leadership is critical for a school's success. Which ONE of the following statements is True?

Answer the question correctly and earn a ticket.
Learn More

Questions & Comments

To comment or reply, please sign in .

user avatar
Jeff Camp August 16, 2018 at 2:12 pm
In 2018 the Wallace Foundation invested in research about the role and effectiveness of "Principal Supervisors" -- a strategy for providing support and oversight to school leaders in very large districts. The research found patterns of success with this strategy. Notably: focus the job on instructional leadership, keep the span of responsibility to supporting no more than a dozen schools, and invest focus in supporting them in their role as instructional leaders.
user avatar
Veli Waller April 8, 2015 at 4:23 pm
What is the average time principals stay in their role? Is there a significant difference between elementary and secondary principals time in their position?
user avatar
Robert Crowell May 4, 2018 at 9:06 am
Good question. I would be interested in seeing data on that as well. From personal observation it seems that elementary school principals stay in their position longer that secondary principals
user avatar
Jeff Camp May 25, 2018 at 3:39 pm
It appears that principal turnover averages about four years (now indicated in the lesson, with a link). Frankly I'm not that impressed with the data source. Each school has a leadership history, but I haven't found a way to find and assemble that data from detail. This feels like fertile ground for public records research. Turnover of district superintendents in big districts averages about six years according to a study by the Broad Center. This is less churn than I imagined, living in the Bay Area.
user avatar
Carol Kocivar - Ed100 December 14, 2014 at 1:24 pm
A 2014 report, "CHURN: The High Cost of Principal Turnover", argues that focusing primarily on principal preparation ignores the problem of "churn". It finds:
"Twenty  thousand (one quarter of the country’s principals) leave their schools
each year, leaving millions of children’s lives adversely affected. Fifty percent of new
principals quit during their third year in the role. Those that remain frequently do
not stay at high poverty schools, trading difficult-to-lead schools for less demanding leadership roles that serve more affluent populations."
It calls for decision makers to value and prioritize principal retention efforts as much as principal pipeline development and offers a series of specific recommendations.
http://connectleadsucceed.org/sites/default/files/principal_turnover_cost.pdf
©2003-2018 Jeff Camp
Design by SimpleSend

Sharing is caring!

Password Reset

Change your mind? Sign In.

Search all lesson and blog content here.

Welcome Back!

Login with Email

We will send your Login Link to your email
address. Click on the link and you will be
logged into Ed100. No more passwords to
remember!

Share via Email

Join Ed100

Already a member? Login

Or Create Account