Which school do you want to support?
As discussed in the previous lesson, California's funding for public education is ordinary, compared to other states. Not the best, not the worst.
Unfortunately, this is bad news for California students, because money is only good for what it can buy, and California is a very expensive place.
Money is only good for what it can buy
Most of the costs of a school are people costs such as salaries, benefits and pensions, which cost more in California than they do in other states. California school districts can afford less of everything that matters most — such as teachers, school leaders, counselors, aides, and support staff.
Because California is state with high wages and a high cost of living, education dollars don’t go as far here as they do elsewhere.
For example, the cost of living in Texas and Florida is much lower than in California, which enables teacher salaries to be lower in those states. There are other states with high costs, like New York and New Jersey. As discussed in Lesson 8.1, those states compensate by investing considerably more economic effort per student to fund education than California does.
The student-teacher ratio in California is much higher than in the rest of the US
There are different ways of ranking the states in terms of their investment in education, but the rankings that matter most are those that compare purchasing power.
The math is unavoidable. Higher salaries and less money to pay for them means California children have a lot fewer teachers involved in their education. It's a big gap.
Comparing is hard.
Nationally comparable education data routinely take three years or more to be compiled and published by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). Each year's latest education data is like a time capsule from the past, a challenge we discuss in Ed100 Lesson 9.5. In a 2019 blog post we argued for a more streamlined approach to national education data.
It's not just about teacher ratios, either. California compares unfavorably with other states in terms of the presence of adults, period. For example, in 2022-23 California’s student-to-school-counselor ratio was 464-to-1, ranked 43rd in the US.
Too much bureaucracy? No. California has significantly fewer administrators per student than average.
Skeptics sometimes assume that California schools and districts are administration-heavy, but they are mistaken. California laws restrict the number of administrators a district may employ. Overall, California's schools and districts are supported by significantly fewer administrators per student than the national average. Too little administrative oversight and lack of leadership has been harmful to California students, according to research conducted as part of a set of high-profile studies known as Getting Down to Facts II.
Comparing resources in schools, 2022-23
California | Rest of USA | California rank | |
---|---|---|---|
Students per teacher | 21.9 | 14.8 | 3rd worst in USA |
Students per counselor | 464 | 376 | 8th worst in USA |
Students per administrator * | 236 | 168 | 7th worst in USA |
In many states, education advocates have turned to the judicial branch of government to make the case for more funding for education. Some state constitutions explicitly or implicitly require their school system to provide students with at least an adequate education. Litigation, or the threat of it, has compelled some states to increase spending on education. California's courts declined to follow their lead.
The question is meaningful, anyway. What resources do schools actually need in order to provide students with an adequate basic level of education?
The 2018 report What Does It Cost to Educate California’s Students? took a bottom-up approach to the question, following the example of litigation in other states. The study, part of the "Getting Down to Facts II" project, consulted multiple expert panels to estimate the necessary staff and services required for an effective California middle school.
The panel advised that schools serving students with higher needs require additional resources. How much? After itemizing headcount requirements and costs, the report recommended an overall boost of about a third in order for a well-run middle school to take on the goals set by the State Board of Education.
The expert panel recommended the resources and ratios below as a minimum definition of adequate staff and services for a middle school:
Adequate resources for a California middle school |
|
---|---|
Core instruction |
Seven periods a day AND two periods for planning and collaboration among teachers. |
An average class size of 22 students for the core subjects (i.e., English language arts, Math, and Science). This excludes resource teachers or teachers supporting special education and English learner students. Once these additional instructors are considered, the estimated pupil–teacher ratio is 15:1. |
|
Special populations |
One or two English language specialists, as well as two educational assistants, to support new students who are classified as ELs. |
Small caseloads for special education staff: up to 7 students with high-severity disabilities per educational specialist, and 17 students with low-severity disabilities per educational specialist. |
|
Student and other support |
About 10 more instructional and pupil support staff for a typical middle school with 609 students. |
Professional development opportunities for staff, including in-house programs as well as funds for teachers to attend conferences. |
|
Extended day and year |
Smaller class sizes in the extended time programs (compared to the core program class sizes), reducing the pupil–teacher ratio from 30:1 to 18:1. |
All students with severe disabilities enrolled in special education to attend summer school. |
Parent groups, local education foundations, and philanthropists in California try valiantly to support their schools with fundraising of many types. But you can't bake-sale your way out of an ongoing operating gap of this magnitude.
The next two lessons explain the sources of school funding in California and the role played by Prop. 13, which thoroughly upended the state’s education system.
Search all lesson and blog content here.
Login with Email
We will send your Login Link to your email
address. Click on the link and you will be
logged into Ed100. No more passwords to
remember!
Questions & Comments
To comment or reply, please sign in .
Among Us July 30, 2023 at 7:05 am
Jeff Camp - Founder July 30, 2023 at 2:56 pm
Carol Kocivar August 4, 2022 at 1:20 pm
School bus fleets are dominated by diesel combustion vehicles. These buses create pollution that harms the environment and are costly to operate. The cost of fuel and repairs necessary to maintain a diesel combustion system erode resources that could otherwise be used to support other aspects of school transportation programs.
The state 2022-23 Budget includes $1.5 billion one-time Proposition 98 General Fund, available over five years, to support greening school bus fleets through programs that will be operated by the California Air Resources Board and the California Energy Commission. This is part of a larger $6.1 billion package to accelerate the state’s transition to Zero-Emission Vehicles.
Carol Kocivar August 4, 2022 at 1:18 pm
The Budget provides $637 million ongoing Proposition 98 General Fund to reimburse local educational agencies for up to 60 percent of their transportation costs in the prior year.
Additionally, commencing in 2023-24, the Budget reflects the application of an ongoing cost-of-living adjustment to the current LCFF Home-to-School transportation add-on.
Carol Kocivar August 4, 2022 at 1:16 pm
The Budget provides $637 million ongoing Proposition 98 General Fund to reimburse local educational agencies for up to 60 percent of their transportation costs in the prior year.
Additionally, commencing in 2023-24, the Budget reflects the application of an ongoing cost-of-living adjustment to the current LCFF Home-to-School transportation add-on.
Vik November 5, 2017 at 11:13 pm
Elizabeth Perkins October 27, 2017 at 5:06 pm
Caryn-C September 11, 2017 at 11:33 am
It is interesting to view the issue in terms of California being a high wage, high cost of living state. Well, so is New York and they are investing almost double in their students? Pretty embarrassing.
Esmeralda Munoz April 29, 2020 at 1:36 pm
ed August 27, 2016 at 11:51 pm
Making better with less
Brandi Galasso May 2, 2015 at 4:15 pm
Tay Fe April 24, 2015 at 9:54 am
Veli Waller April 10, 2015 at 8:22 pm