Which school do you want to support?
In California, local school communities willing to tax themselves to better support the basic operations of their schools have just one option: the parcel tax.
Proposition 13 prohibited school districts from raising property taxes based on the value of property (“ad valorem taxes”), except for General Obligation bonds for facilities. It also required districts to secure two-thirds voter approval to pass a parcel tax.
Let's find a hack
'round Prop 13
a parcel tax
to staunch the bleed
and give some schools
the dough they need
if two out of three
Most parcel taxes assess a flat fee on each parcel of property, no matter its size or value. California is actually the only state that uses this particular form of property tax to fund schools — and for good reason. Parcel taxes are a regressive tax by definition: they put a larger burden on less expensive properties (and less wealthy property owners). The owner of a small single family home in a modest neighborhood pays the same tax as the corporate owner of a manufacturing plant or large apartment complex. Some districts have added provisions to their parcel tax measures that cause taxes to vary, but usually this is used to avoid taxing parcels owned by senior citizens who might otherwise vote no.
About a tenth of students in California attend a school supported by a parcel tax.
Relatively few districts have attempted to pass a parcel tax because it must pass by a 2/3 vote, which is difficult to achieve. During the recession, however, an increasing number of districts made the effort, despite the necessity to get two “yes” votes to counteract every “no” vote. More than half of the parcel tax elections held since 1983 have passed, but the districts that passed them represent less than 10% of the student population of California. Most are in the San Francisco Bay Area.
One proposal that has surfaced repeatedly is to reduce the passage threshold for parcel taxes to 55%. Voters approved a similar “super-majority” provision for facility bonds in 2001. (See Lesson 5.9.) If the passage rate for local parcel taxes for schools were simply lowered, many more communities would likely pass them, as discussed in this short video from the Public Policy Institute of California.
All proposals that make it easier for local communities to raise money for schools risk bumping up against concerns about equitable funding, the same issues that created California’s landmark school finance case: Serrano v Priest. (Note: Ed100 author Jeff Camp has suggested an alternative, the "tandem bike" approach.)
Passing a local tax measure — whether it’s a parcel tax or a general obligation bond — can deliver benefits to a school community beyond money. To succeed, local campaigns in support of schools must engage whole communities in public education issues, challenges, and opportunities. It's door-to-door, handshake-to-handshake work. If you are thinking about it, start with a visit to the registrar of voters in your county to understand the process.
The next lesson delves into one more way communities support their schools — as volunteers. Volunteer resources are noteworthy, but seldom accounted for in a meaningful way.
Search all lesson and blog content here.
Not a member? Join now.
or via email
Already Joined Ed100? Sign In.
or via email