You Earned a Ticket!

Which school do you want to support?

Lesson 3.8

Pay:
How Has Teacher Pay Changed?

Great teachers should get bonuses, right? Unless…

hero image

Teacher pay is by far the largest cost of operating a school. People choose to become teachers for many reasons, but getting rich is not among them.

As a job, teaching is steady, secure work, but it doesn't pay very well — especially for new teachers. Many new teachers struggle to find places they can afford to live, and it is common for teachers to work second jobs.

In decades long past, teaching was once perceived as a relatively lucrative profession for women, whose professional options were constrained. This premium has evaporated.

The Teacher Salary Project documents the economic struggles of teachers, and the impact that it has on children.

Since about 1980, teacher pay in America has lagged comparable employment, as described in Lesson 3.1. Dr. Sylvia Allegretto, an economist at the University of California, Berkeley, has studied teacher compensation for many years. Her analysis incorporates data from all over the US, including hours worked, salaries, bonuses and benefits earned. Her models examine differences in compensation by gender, age, experience, union membership and geography. According to Dr. Allegretto's 2018 analysis, the scale of the American "teacher wage gap" has been expanding for years. In terms of weekly wages, teacher pay lagged comparable work by 18.7% nationally. Including the value of benefits, the annualized total compensation gap reached a record 11.1%. (Note: The gap is smaller in California than it is in most states.)

Pay for teachers in America is also low in comparison with pay for teachers in other countries. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) collects international data about public education, which it summarizes annually in its monumental publication Education at a Glance. In the following chart look waaay over to the the right to find the United States.

Lower secondary teachers' salaries relative to earnings for tertiary-educated workers (2015).
Source: Education at a Glance 2017: OECD Indicators - © OECD 2017 (Figure 3.1, Table 3.2)

According to OECD research, teacher pay has fallen below the average for college-educated workers in virtually all countries, but the gap in America is unusually large. For example, in its 2017 edition (Table D3.2) the OECD report estimated that pay for primary teachers in America was about 57% that of comparably educated workers. California teacher salary levels tend to be a little higher, but then California is an expensive place.

Teacher Pay Varies by School District

Teacher pay and compensation are typically negotiated between school districts and teacher unions. The graphic below from the California Legislative Analyst shows the average package offered by districts in each county (Click image to view interactive version). Benefits in this view include health, dental, and vision coverage. Other benefits are not included, most notably pension contributions or benefits.

The District Salary Schedule Sets Teacher Pay

Teacher pay is usually determined by just two things: years worked in the district and number of postgraduate credits earned as recognized by that district.

Teachers in virtually all American public schools are compensated according to a rigidly defined “single salary schedule.” If you know the number of years a teacher has worked in a district (“step”) and the number of postgraduate credits the teacher has completed ("column" or "lane"), you can determine his or her pay, perhaps with the addition of a few small adjustments or incentives. Many districts offer a salary increase to teachers who obtain a master’s degree.

Those steps and columns can differ significantly from one district to another. For example, the graphs below show the basic salary schedules for Oakland Unified and San Mateo / Foster City in 2016. When teachers make a career move, pay is one important factor.

 

Are these salary schedules good or bad, you might ask. As usual, the answer is mixed.

The good news is that the widespread use of a single salary schedule has reduced or even erased discriminatory pay practices related to gender and ethnicity.

Seniority is generally counted in terms of the number of years a teacher has worked in a specific district. Taking a job in a different district usually resets the teacher's seniority. Districts generally do not match an experienced teacher's pay when "stealing" a teacher from another district, reflecting the power of seniority-based pay systems in teacher contracts. At the high end of the experience curve, teachers are paid more than they would be in a strictly competitive marketplace, and there is a real penalty to changing employers. Especially when paired with the teacher pension system the salary schedule delivers very strong "stay-put" incentives that contribute to the stability of district faculty. Teachers have economic reasons to stay with a district, even if it is a tough place to work.

The bad news is that the single salary schedule system is indifferent to expertise, effectiveness, and market conditions. Teachers typically earn the same regardless of whether they teach effectively or ineffectively, whether they teach a subject that requires general knowledge or specialized knowledge, whether they teach many children or a handful, and whether or not they bring out the best in their colleagues. Also, as discussed in Ed100 Lesson 3.5 there is little or no evidence that students benefit when teachers earn advanced degrees. This may be money that could be better spent.

Alternative Approaches

In the past few years a growing number of voices have argued that major changes to the salary schedule should be “on the table” in district and union dialogue about strategies for change.

Reforms related to teacher pay revise the salary schedule (or replace it altogether) in order to change the incentive structure. (See puzzle graphic for examples.) All elements of an alternative compensation (altcomp) program are controversial, but none more so than performance pay, sometimes also known as "merit pay".

Federal programs have offered competitive grants to accelerate adoption of alternative teacher pay systems, particularly performance pay systems. Under the Bush Administration, the Teacher Incentive Fund (TIF) committed several hundred million dollars to support programs that include a performance pay component. Under the Obama Administration, the much larger Race to the Top (RTT) and School Improvement Fund (SIF) programs also provided support for alternative compensation plans in schools with high concentrations of low-income students.

Pay-based incentives are common in business. Many businesspeople regard it as self-evident that teacher pay should vary with performance, too. Many teachers, by contrast, regard it as self-evident that teachers aren't in it for the money and find incentives patronizing. In 2009 Daniel Pink brought attention to the motivational risks of pay for performance in his bestseller Drive: the Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us. The heart of Pink’s thesis is that intrinsic motivation comes from a desire to achieve mastery, autonomy, and purpose. He presents evidence that conditional pay incentives can actually interfere with that drive.

Does It Work?

If your school or district is considering changes to the way teachers are paid, prepare for a bumpy ride, particularly if the program involves judgments about performance. You can add a lot to the California teacher salary conversation by doing your homework.

Evaluations of pay-for-performance trials have not shown widespread results in terms of student learning gains, though the results appear to vary according to program design. Those who hoped for magical results from pay-for-performance trials have been disappointed in Denver, New York and Chicago.

A study of schools using a prominent alternative compensation system, TAP, documented some student learning gains in early trials, but the effects seemed to fade.

Perhaps those experiments were merely too tentative. An evaluation of the most aggressive of all pay-for-performance plans, the IMPACT program in Washington, D.C., appears to show results, mainly by spurring low-performing teachers to quit. Bruce Baker, a professor at Rutgers who comments extensively on flaws in the interpretation of data about education results, questions whether getting teachers to quit actually counts as a positive result.

With support from the Gates Foundation, Aspire, a charter school network, implemented a multi-faceted teacher evaluation system that includes a pay component. Jill Tucker, a California journalist with long experience covering education, describes the Aspire approach in SFGate.

If your school or district is considering changes to the way teachers are paid, prepare for a bumpy ride, particularly if the program involves judgments about performance. You can add a lot to the conversation by doing the homework that others may avoid. It is a much more complex topic than most believe, and the evidence of impact from past attempts is weak compared to the certainty of distracting conflict associated with attempting it. It's instructive to view Laney's story, the video at the top of this lesson, and consider what she needs to be successful.

Complex... yet Skimpy

Varying models of teacher compensation can lead to passionate conversations, but California teacher salary conversations tend to return to the context: funding for education in California is persistently skimpy. California teacher salary levels suffer ultimately from a lack of funding. Varying the form of pay can't make up for the gap.

Updated October 2017, Jan 2018, May 2018, July 2018, September 2018.

Review

Teacher pay in virtually all American public schools is based on:

Answer the question correctly and earn a ticket.
Learn More

Questions & Comments

To comment or reply, please sign in .

user avatar
Carol Kocivar June 18, 2018 at 6:39 am
Low Teacher Salaries 101
This paper takes a state-by-state look at education spending levels, teacher salaries, and how salary levels correlate with turnover, staffing shortages, and other issues.

Here is the link.
https://www.erstrategies.org/tap/low_teacher_salaries_101
user avatar
Pamela Wright April 16, 2018 at 2:39 am
How does teacher salary vary by state?
user avatar
Jeff Camp - Founder April 17, 2018 at 1:08 pm
The short answer is that it varies with the cost of living. School districts pay what the market demands to hire college-educated employees. More in lesson 3.1
user avatar
Pamela Wright April 16, 2018 at 2:38 am
What has more impact on student performance, socio economics or teacher performamce?
user avatar
Jeff Camp - Founder April 17, 2018 at 1:46 pm
Lesson 2.2 explores the profound impact of poverty on student outcomes. There have been extraordinary examples of students overcoming the obstacles of poverty with the support of extraordinary teachers, but poverty is a corrosive to student learning AND to teachers' capacity to help students. It's not an accident that free lunch was one of the very first programs created to support schools. School work is hard, and requires concentration. Hunger, exhaustion and insecurity undermine concentration. The hazards of poverty extend to teachers, too -- for example, housing insecurity is a real issue for many teachers in California..
user avatar
Carol Kocivar April 8, 2018 at 10:40 am
One more bit of research on teacher pay. This time from the Economic Policy Institute. This one breaks down the gap by state. In no state are teachers paid more than other college graduates.
Check out their graphic
user avatar
Carol Kocivar September 19, 2017 at 11:22 am
How do teacher salaries compare to others with the same level of education? Not well. The 2017 Education at a Glance: OECD Indicators finds that "Teachers earn less than 60% of the salaries of similarly educated workers." Here is the summary of findings:

http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/9617041ec072.pdf
user avatar
Jeff Camp March 16, 2017 at 5:08 pm
Should California exempt teachers from state taxes? Versions of this proposal have come up a few times, including SB807 in 2017. It would cost about $600 million annually. Via Cabinet Report
user avatar
Jeff Camp November 18, 2016 at 3:42 pm
The pay gap for teachers continues to widen, according to Sylvia Allegretto of the Economic Policy Institute: http://www.epi.org/publication/the-teacher-pay-gap-is-wider-than-ever-teachers-pay-continues-to-fall-further-behind-pay-of-comparable-workers/
user avatar
Carol Kocivar October 28, 2016 at 12:33 pm
A Quick Look at the Teacher Shortage
Check out our blog that discusses the widening teacher pay gap.
https://ed100.org/blog/teacher-shortage
user avatar
Jeff Camp September 20, 2016 at 9:16 am
Housing is a growing problem for teachers as housing prices have risen much faster than teacher salaries. According to an analysis by Redfin, a national real estate brokerage, a rapidly-shrinking percentage of listings are priced within reach of a teacher salary. In several California counties there are literally zero properties that a teacher could afford to buy. The report includes links to images of example properties that teachers could afford in each county. https://www.redfin.com/blog/2016/09/california-housing-affordability-for-teachers.html
user avatar
Carol Kocivar - Ed100 December 4, 2014 at 10:57 am
A new report "SMART MONEY: What teachers make, how long it takes and what it buys them" from the National Council on Teacher Quality takes a look at teacher salaries across the country. One finding:
"Generally speaking, the salary trajectory for teaching is characterized by relatively small, incremental raises doled out each year, serving in stark contrast to many jobs in the private sector, with its system of promotions, bonuses and relatively rapid raises."
http://www.nctq.org/dmsView/Smart_Money
user avatar
Jeff Camp - Founder November 7, 2011 at 3:07 pm
In late 2011 The Atlantic published a summary of four studies on the question "Are Teachers paid too much" http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2011/11/are-teachers-paid-too-much-how-4-studies-answered-1-big-question/247872/
user avatar
Tamara Schiff March 31, 2011 at 3:35 pm
TAP: The System for Teacher and Student Advancement is a comprehensive school reform that is reaching nearly 20,000 teachers and 200,000 students across the country. TAP is comprised of four essential elements that are Aligned by Design--one of which is a performance pay component. Along with career opportunities for advancement, a fair and transparent evaluation system and job-embedded professional development, teachers are able to earn more for their demonstrated performance. Teachers who take on additional roles and responsibilities are compensated accordingly, while all teachers in TAP schools are eligible for annual bonuses based on multiple performance measures including classroom observation scores, individual and school wide student achievement growth. As noted in your other sections, TAP also recognizes that we need to attract, retain, develop and motivate the most talented individuals for the teaching profession. Data show that TAP addresses the intrinsic motivation of teachers to strive for excellence and effectiveness, and results in a high degree of faculty collegiality, thus proving that pay for performance is compatible with these values when it is an integral part of a well-designed support system. The comprehensive implementation of TAP has proven to improve teacher effectiveness and student achievement. The paper linked above, as well as additional research outcomes can be found at http://www.tapsystem.org/publications/tap_research_summary_0210.pdf.

The teaching profession needs to make dramatic changes in order to ensure that the most effective teachers are in our classrooms. TAP provides an opportunity to make the changes necessary to improve teacher quality and student learning for all children.
user avatar
Don Shalvey March 31, 2011 at 8:18 am
The profession of teaching is one of the most noble and dignifying callings anyone could consider. Compensation starts with the joy and satisfaction that comes from increasing the opportunities your students will have as they grow and is closely followed by the satisfation that comes from working with stunning colleagues. Does financial compensation matter? Absolutely. A teacher's ability to earn a family sustaining income, live a comfortable life and help support the futures of their own children is an aspiration every teacher should achieve.
If we consider the facts that some subject areas like math, sciences and special education have enormous teacher shortages and that there are schools where many students have been traditionally underserved then addressing these needs with additional compensation is both logical and appropriate. It is also appropriate to recognize the value that a teacher adds to his or her students in the areas of intellectual, personal and social development. Outcomes matter both in terms of value to the studenmts and value to one's colleagues and the positive culture and climate at the school.
The challenge is how to do it in a fair and consistent manner. It is a challenge worth accepting knowing that more often than not the concept of fairness emerges locally rather than nationally. We must find ways to honor and recognize highly effective teachers and find incentives to have them continue to bring their talents and inspiration to youth for many years. I believe those incentives are a combination of an increased base compensation, incentive compensation for preparation, assignment and performance with a stroing nod towards insuring that they interact always with stunning colleagues and an effective and inspiring principal.
©2003-2018 Jeff Camp
Design by SimpleSend

Sharing is caring!

Password Reset

Change your mind? Sign In.

Search all lesson and blog content here.

Sign In

Not a member? Join now.

or via email

Share via Email

Join Ed100

Already Joined Ed100? Sign In.

or via email