You Earned a Ticket!

Which school do you want to support?

Lesson 6.6

Technology in Education:
Tools for teaching and learning

This time, technology really WILL change education. Right?

hero image

It seemed that schools were impervious to change.

Until recently, classrooms looked just as they had 50 years ago, with the possible change from a blackboard to a whiteboard. But that’s the way change happens. All of a sudden, the future arrives.

All of a sudden, the future arrives.

Advances in technology are constantly changing the way that students learn, both in and out of school. The oracles of this revolution, Clayton Christensen and Michael Horn, predicted the path that these changes would take in the 2008 book Disrupting Class. They argued that educational software and online teaching would fundamentally disrupt the way that schools work and the ways that children learn. It would start out awful, they predicted, but it would improve steadily and become mainstream.

When students want to know or learn something, they go online. In an internet minute, teachers became the second-best alternative, replaced by the oracles of YouTube. The global digital capital of time-wasting cat clips is also the most attractive way for students to learn things they want to know, from the science of slime to the history of the world, hilariously delivered in under 20 minutes.

Blended learning = teachers + tech

Some of California’s highest-performing charter schools pioneered the jump to using technology for daily instruction, setting the stage for all schools in the pandemic. In education lingo, the combination of learning from both teachers and technology is sometimes called blended learning. The implications can be significant, if schools really lean into it.

Among the earliest pioneers in blended learning was a charter school network called Rocketship The big idea was to combine traditional instruction, technology, and tutoring to allow every student to learn at their own pace, whether they are catching up or racing ahead. They dubbed the approach "flipping the classroom" because it aimed to reverse the use of classroom time. In most classrooms, teachers explain new concepts to students in a big group, and then students are supposed to practice the skills on their own at home. In a "flipped" model, students practice in the classroom and new concepts can be introduced through videos individually assigned as homework.

In the Ed100 Blog:
Sal Khan says we're doing education wrong. Are we really listening?

Technology doesn't need to be fancy to be effective. One of the most celebrated websites for education is Khan Academy, which began modestly as a big set of short YouTube videos. One person, Sal Khan, posted simple lessons on subjects from algebra to venture capital. Thousands around the globe have benefitted from his patient, clear tutorials. Today, the site is no longer just for the individual learner; it includes tools to help teachers, parents, and other "coaches" support students as they learn. Technology has a charming tendency to become better and cheaper over time.

Some schools are proving faster than others in taking advantage of the possibilities of tech in learning. Consistent with Christensen’s theory, in America many of the first students to take advantage of online learning were homeschool students, whose parents chose not to enroll them in regular schools for religious or other reasons. Online learning also offers enormous promise for economic development in high-poverty settings; in the early days of the internet, education researcher Sugata Mitra documented examples of students self-organizing to learn from online resources without even the benefit of a teacher to guide them.

Virtual schools

Computing power and connectivity shifted homeschooling to a new, fast-growing format: virtual schools. In its most pure manifestation, a virtual school is organized as a charter school. Students enroll, receive a computer if they don’t have one, and sign up for online courses. But virtual schools are evolving fast and can take many forms. Students may work with teachers and other students online and by phone. They may meet in person. They may be oriented toward self-paced learning, or may have a fixed schedule. Some virtual schools focus on credit recovery, enabling students that are behind schedule to earn a diploma while taking a break from their school environment. Many highlight their schedule flexibility, enabling students to nurse a newborn, or work a day job to earn money for their family. Some focus on offering an accelerated path to college.

And some are awful. In 2016 the California Department of Justice reached a multimillion dollar settlement agreement with a for-profit online charter school operator over alleged violations of California laws. In 2019 the California legislature banned for-profit charter schools altogether.

But true to the Clayton Christensen's prediction, technology is everywhere in education. Clearly, the pandemic accelerated a process that was happening anyway. Despite the problems, the digital revolution has come to schools and it looks like it is here to stay, with one big obstacle: infrastructure costs money.

Infrastructure costs money

Each student needs digital access at school and at home to learn and do homework. This is a universal infrastructure requirement, like clean water and electricity.

There is nothing inevitable about the future shape of this revolution in learning. Khan Academy and YouTube are free, but computers, tablets, networks and tech staff aren't. Schools face real costs to cobble together the computers, tablets, routers and switches that make connectivity possible. Even if a school’s digital infrastructure is up-to-date (occasionally true), training for teachers and school staff is expensive, and maintaining a network is a job that requires staff. Technology-savvy individuals have many employment options, and schools struggle to attract and retain staff with technical skills. If your school doesn't have the networks and computers that students and teachers need, contact your school board. School districts in California have wide discretion in how they use funds. Ask whether there is a plan to fund technology infrastructure in an upcoming bond measure.

Inconsistent access to education technology can contribute to achievement gaps. In schools in well-off neighborhoods, internet access reaches every corner of every classroom. But this kind of access is far from universal.

Schools are becoming similar to "grown up" workplaces, where technology is vital and complex.

As they became connected, schools became more similar to "grown up" workplaces, where technology is vital and complex. In businesses, technical leaders make good money and serve an influential role. Schools making a digital transition need expert leadership, too. Windows, Mac or Linux? Microsoft Office or Google Docs? Chromebooks or iPads? What's allowed? What's not? What happens when things break? Because school budgets are ultimately reflections of value, school boards face tough decisions: Should money go toward teachers or tablets or technical support staff?

Technology at home: the homework gap

As technology-based tools for learning continue to improve, the meaning of homework is changing. "Papers" don't involve paper - they are submitted as Google Docs. Teachers can assign video lessons. Students can collaborate on digital projects. Of course, all this technical innovation is no help at all for students without decent computers and effective internet access.

The gap at the outset of the pandemic was massive. Based on survey of U.S. adults in April 2021, children from lower-income households faced a disproportionate homework gap. 23% of low-income children needed to use public WiFi networks in order to complete school assignments because their signal at home was unreliable.

The April 2021 survey also found that parents with lower and middle incomes were more likely to report that they found it difficult to help their kids navigate tech for online learning. Rural and urban parents struggled more than their suburban counterparts.

In 2022, most schools were back to in-person operation. With the benefit of hindsight, Pew Research asked teens what they preferred: in-person or remote learning? Generally, most students preferred to be in person:

Source: Pew Research Center analysis

Consistent network access is essential for students, as important as binder paper and #2 pencils. Adequate "signal" is essential not just for the office of the school principal, but for each classroom and meeting space and, more difficult still, for each home where children live, study and learn. Past generations have built America's universal access to clean water, modern roads, and reliable electricity. To avoid leaving children behind, this generation must find ways to equip schools, homes, and shelters with effective universal network access.

Some argue that unless schools embrace digital tools for students and teachers they risk becoming irrelevant. The general theme of "relevance" is taken up in the next lesson.

Updated July 2017, March 2019, December 2021, November 2022

Quiz

Which ONE of the following is NOT important for a successful “blended learning” experience?

Answer the question correctly and earn a ticket.
Learn More

Questions & Comments

To comment or reply, please sign in .

user avatar
francisco molina January 12, 2022 at 4:16 am
Antes de la pandemia, en estados que tienen un clima extremo y dificultan la asistencia escolar, los consejeros escolares desarrollaron una aplicación desde donde podían enseñar y hacer consejería, es algo preparado y solo, mediante emails se ponen de acuerdo.California es líder mundial en el desarrollo de tecnología de este tipo, es además la quinta economía mundial, Porque no crear algo dedicado a solucionar el problema de raíz e implementarlo en forma definitiva y de paso mejorar no solo el progreso académico de sus estudiantes sino que ademas recuperar la comunicación educacional.
user avatar
Selisa Loeza October 25, 2021 at 8:56 pm
Another factor to consider is teaching families/caretakers how to support with technology, especially younger students.

Some children living with family who do not speak English or struggle in general with technology. Some may be raised by more elderly guardians who do not understand technological advancements, etc. Supporting them as they support students is crucial.
user avatar
Anna Meza January 23, 2021 at 11:17 pm
Considering how quickly technology infrastructure becomes outdated, are bond measures really a wise investment to fund these expenditures?
user avatar
Jenny Greene July 27, 2020 at 7:33 am
This lesson has me thinking about our district and all the others that will engage in 100% distance learning this year due to the coronavirus. It makes me wonder if "flipping the classroom" in this instance would better serve the students so as to maximize the time they have with the teacher in online live sessions?
user avatar
Susannah Baxendale February 2, 2019 at 11:54 am
The decisions about what systems to purchase or to opt into were surfacing early this century in our school district. In those days, the Ed Foundation was funding 'mini grants' to teachers who applied for novelties like smart boards, laptops in the classroom etc. Initially there was so little technology in the classroom that it didn't matter what a teacher wanted to purchase or use, but fairly soon, it because an issue as the district began to consider the picture. But how the district decided on what to use (eg Mac or PC, one smart board brand over another) depended I believe on their one district tech advisor's input and whether that person had access to what other districts had tried--input on what was effective, cost-effective, etc is an unknown.
user avatar
Jamie Kiffel-Alcheh November 12, 2019 at 9:13 pm
Mini grants for tech are an interesting issue. I sometimes feel that schools proudly acquire technology because they hear that it is good for students, but they don’t really know why and they don’t know exactly what to do with it. One charter school I know has digital boards in every classroom. Yet the school specializes in integrating children with and without special needs. The sensory overwhelm of screens in every room doesn’t mesh with the students’ needs, in my opinion.
user avatar
Carol Kocivar May 20, 2018 at 3:24 pm
A research brief from the National Education Policy Center does not have good news on virtual schools. It concludes:

"Full-time virtual schools and blended learning schools represent promising ideas... Unfortunately, the evidence is overwhelming that virtual schools as currently implemented are not working at primary and secondary levels of schools."

Read the report

user avatar
Carol Kocivar November 4, 2017 at 1:48 pm
On-Line Schooling: Who is hurt and who is helped?
A review of the research by Brookings finds that online students do better with blended learning (since it includes face to face teacher interaction ) and academically challenged students do worse in online than in face-to-face courses.

https://www.brookings.edu/research/who-should-take-online-courses/
user avatar
Jeff Camp January 19, 2017 at 2:14 pm
Official statistics on school connectivity in California are ridiculously rosy. According to EducationSuperhighway.org, most school districts have met the national benchmark for providing internet access. But this state is far from offering decent connectivity to every room in every school and homework space. Here's the official national report. You can report the reality of connectivity in your own school here: http://www.compareandconnectk12.org/2016/CA?opportunity=BANDWIDTH
user avatar
francisco molina December 7, 2022 at 2:39 pm
Jeff, that reality still alive inside of the fith economy of the world. The words of Jerry Brown still present as a legacy.
user avatar
Carol Kocivar July 14, 2016 at 8:16 pm
A hot debate in education circles: Virtual Charter schools
Education NEXT looks at the research and provides a discussion of the pros and cons.
http://educationnext.org/promise-and-pitfalls-of-virtual-charter-schools-vander-ark-richmond/
user avatar
Albert Stroberg May 1, 2016 at 8:05 pm
One of the best systems I have seen allows the kids to progress at their own rate (almost Montessori style) yet it could alert the teacher if a a particular student was at a speed bump. This seemed a very good use of tech- unlike the large & expensive side track much of it has become.
user avatar
Liz Fischer June 30, 2015 at 6:10 pm
In my former life, before kids, I worked for a computer curriculum publisher that used artificial intelligence to help students improve math skills based on NCTM standards. It tested and tracked progress then assigned more problems in areas of difficulty until mastery was achieved. Though impressive gains were achieved, the methodology was none-the-less derogatorily referred to as "drill and kill." I wonder how current "blended learning" is different?
user avatar
Paigey Girl April 22, 2015 at 9:03 pm
Technology changes so quickly that by the time teachers a proficient to teach it, it's changed again.
user avatar
trckrnnr April 15, 2015 at 9:00 am
There needs to be a balance with art music drama and technology. They get enough technology time the rest they need more of
user avatar
Veli Waller April 10, 2015 at 8:08 am
Teachers need professional development on technology. I have heard teachers say that the computer lab time that they have is a stressful time. Some teachers are not proficient with technology and are not able to use the time effectively.
user avatar
cnuptac March 26, 2015 at 10:47 am
Our kids get to do on line stuff every day and the sad part is they don't get to do art or music or drama not even once a month
user avatar
CM January 19, 2015 at 3:48 pm
We must expose our children to technology. This is a "must", not a "nice to have" part of teaching.
Technology is growing at a fast pace. The world will be a completely different place by the time these children graduate from high school. We must do whatever it takes to prepare our children for careers in 21st century workplaces.
user avatar
Arati N June 23, 2014 at 7:36 am
Access and infrastructure is one thing, but the more important thing is WHAT is done with technology in the classroom - teacher training is very important and teacher credentialing courses should have technology integration built into the course work- technology is becoming as ubiquitous as the 3R's.
©2003-2024 Jeff Camp
Design by SimpleSend

Sharing is caring!

Password Reset

Change your mind? Sign In.

Search all lesson and blog content here.

Welcome Back!

Login with Email

We will send your Login Link to your email
address. Click on the link and you will be
logged into Ed100. No more passwords to
remember!

Share via Email

Get on Board!
Learn how California's School System works so you can make a difference.
Our free lessons are short, easy to read, and up to date. Each lesson you complete earns a ticket for your school. You could win $1,000 for your PTA.

Join Ed100

Already a member? Login

Or Create Account