The Trump administration's proposal for the 2026 federal budget calls for alarming cuts in services that support children and families, including education. This post summarizes the proposal, explains the implications, and suggests actions you can take to object, adjust or both.
None of the President’s proposed cuts come as a surprise — they mirror ideas outlined in a document known as Project 2025, which boldly announced these goals:
The two charts below compare the Trump education budget to proposals of prior presidents and to inflation. As the first chart shows, Trump has proposed greater education cuts than past presidents have proposed in their budgets:
Proposed budgets must survive a legislative process. Most of the time, the proposals (whether up or down) are moderated in that process. As the chart below shows, over time, the amounts actually enacted for education in the federal budget have gradually failed even to keep pace with inflation.
Failure to keep up with inflation results in cuts to teaching staff at local schools. The impact is biggest on children in high-poverty communities because they depend most on federal support.
Even though federal funding is a small part of total education funding, it has a large impact on our most needy children. The federal commitment to help needy children through education can be traced back to the War on Poverty in the 1960s. President Johnson turned a moral commitment to make the United States more equitable into actions through federal programs.
The only “winners” in the Trump education budget are charter schools.
For comparison, take a look at the values implied or declared in the Trump budget proposal. The only “winners” are new charter schools, which gain $60 million ($0.06 billion) in funding across the US. Everything else loses.
Traditional public schools:
Schools throughout the nation will get less funding from the federal government. The proposed Trump budget cuts public education by $12,000 million.
English language learners and migrant children.
There are deep cuts to programs that support English language learners and migrant children.
Diversity, equity, and inclusion programs. (DEI)
A major theme throughout Trump’s budget is to eliminate programs designed to address historic inequities including racism and income inequality.
Low income children.
Federal Title l money supports schools in low income communities. The Trump budget proposal generally preserves this funding — a small victory — but does not keep up with inflation.
Children with special needs.
Federal law (IDEA) requires public schools in all states to educate all children, specifically including students who need special education. This law established an expectation that ongoing federal funds will cover up to 40% of the incremental costs of special education, with the remainder of the incremental costs to be covered by states and local districts. In practice, the federal budget has been covering much less than this intended share — about 12 percent — leaving states and school districts to pick up the slack. To satisfy the obligations under IDEA, districts cut funding from core services. One reform proposal suggests further diluting this funding with a voucher-like program that would give public money to private and religious schools.
Civil rights.
Cuts in the Office for Civil Rights limit the ability to protect special education rights through litigation.
Accountability.
The proposed budget eliminates many education programs that were created to address specific needs, directing funds into block grants. For example, Title I and IDEA include important requirements and protections for students and families. The proposed block grants do not contain these protections. The result is loss of federal oversight and accountability.
Child and Family Health.
The budget cuts or eliminates many programs designed to support health.
Arts and Humanities and Public Broadcasting.
There are significant cuts to programs that support the education of children and families.
The table below summarizes the Trump budget proposal, including the administration’s stated rationale for cuts. The rightmost column provides context. For news about this subject as the budget process continues and issues evolve, follow EdSource.
K-12 Education federal budget proposals, 2026 |
||
---|---|---|
Program change vs. 2025 |
Trump administration rationale |
Context |
$60 million increase |
“Budget invests $500 million, a $60 million increase, to expand the number of high-quality charter schools, which have a proven track record of improving students’ academic achievement and giving parents more choice in the education of their children”. |
Ed100 lesson 5.5 explains public charter schools. There are some great charter schools, and there are quite a lot of ordinary ones. |
No change* |
“Preserves full funding for Title I, the supplemental Federal financial assistance to school districts for children from low-income families.” |
* The proposed “full” funding does not include inflation, so it means a loss of services at schools. |
$4,535 million cut |
“Consolidates 18 competitive and formula grant programs into a new $2 billion formula grant designed to reduce ED’s[*] influence on schools and students and reduce Bureaucracy. “The new approach allows States and districts to focus on the core subjects—math, reading, science, and history—without the distractions of DEI[**] and weaponization from the previous administration.” |
* ED refers to the US Department of Education. ** DEI is an abbreviation for Diversity, Equity and Inclusion] There are concerns that cuts this massive will lead to major cuts in programs that students and families rely on, such as afterschool and summer programs. Direct costs of K-12 programs associated with DEI are tiny in comparison. |
No change in funding, but significant changes in policies |
“Consolidates seven Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) programs to provide States and school districts greater flexibility to support students with special education needs, maintaining funding at the 2025 level. “Parents of students with disabilities would remain empowered to direct these funds because the Federal IDEA law would remain in place; “Maintaining a base set of Federal funds means they can also be withdrawn from States and districts who flout parental rights.” |
Proposed funding remains significantly below the needs of students. Trump administration references to “parental rights” have varied interpretations including the intention to direct funding to private and religious schools. The Trump administration is investigating the state’s ban against outing trans students. |
$890 million cut |
The Budget proposes to eliminate the misnamed English Language Acquisition program which actually deemphasizes English primacy by funding NGOs and States to encourage bilingualism. |
The budget explicitly aims to cut support for programs that enable students to develop multilingual skills, aiming instead to limit education to English. For context, see the Ed100 blog The bilingual advantage. |
Migrant Education and Special Programs for Migrant Students $428 million cut |
“The Budget eliminates programs that work to the detriment of children’s academic success by encouraging movement from, rather than stability and consistency in, a single location.” “These programs have not been proven effective, are extremely costly, and encourage ineligible non-citizens to access U.S. IHEs stripping resources from American students.” |
Children don’t choose their parents. In agricultural areas of the state, it is common for migrant workers to move where the work is, children in tow. Many of these children are US citizens. Either way, they are entitled to the opportunity for a better life through education. For more, see Ed100 lesson 2.9 Undocumented students |
$127 million cut |
“The Budget provides $293 million for program administration, a reduction of $127 million, or 30 percent.” |
The federal department of education (DOE) plays an essential role in enforcing civil rights in education. Data assembled by the federal government is essential to overcome states' noisy, varying approaches and figure out a little bit about what works. See Ed100 lesson 7.2 about the federal government. |
$70 million cut |
“The Budget proposes to end Federal taxpayer dollars being weaponized to indoctrinate new teachers.” “In addition, many of these grants included teacher and staff recruiting strategies implicitly and explicitly based on race.” |
Ed100 Lesson 3.1 explains the teacher recruitment challenge. In California as elsewhere, the teaching profession is dominated by white women. It makes sense to actively recruit teaching candidates more broadly. |
Training and Advisory Services — Equity Assistance Center $7 million cut |
“The Budget eliminates Equity Assistance Centers that have indoctrinated children. Funds have been weaponized to force local districts to implement Washington-directed DEI practices against their will.” |
This small program provided advisory assistance. |
$49 million cut |
“To refocus away from DEI and Title IX transgender cases, the Budget provides OCR with $91 million, a reduction of $49 million, or 35 percent, compared to the 2024 enacted level.” “At this funding level, OCR would continue to ensure that schools and other institutions that receive Federal financial assistance for education programs and activities comply with Federal civil rights laws and Presidential Executive Orders while removing their ability to push DEI programs and promote radical transgender ideology.” |
These cuts are explicitly part of an effort to dissuade the federal Office of Civil Rights (OCR) from pursuing an important part of its core work: protecting students from discrimination on the basis of their gender identity or sexual orientation. Most don’t realize that this kind of protection is directly relevant to about a fifth of students, as Ed100 Lesson 2.1 explains. |
Preschool Development Grants (PDG) $315 million cut to early education. |
Eliminates program. |
Ed100 lesson 4.1 Preschool: Yes, Early Childhood Education Matters. |
Other cuts with consequences for children and families |
||
---|---|---|
Cuts |
Trump administration rationale |
Context |
Small Agency Eliminations $3,586 million cut Among the agencies cut: - Corporation for Public Broadcasting - Institute of Museum and Library Sciences |
“The Budget includes the elimination of, or the elimination of Federal funding for, the following small agencies—consistent with the President’s efforts to decrease the size of the Federal Government to enhance accountability, reduce waste, and reduce unnecessary governmental entities.” |
Ed100 lesson: Arts are crucial to how children learn Ed100 Humanities The need to understand and empathize with each other has arguably never been greater |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Programs $3,588 million cut |
“The Budget eliminates duplicative, DEI, or simply unnecessary programs” |
Ed100 blog: Health and Learning: What Can Schools Do? |
National Institute of Health (NIH) $17,965 million cut |
“NIH has broken the trust of the American people with wasteful spending, misleading information, risky research, and the promotion of dangerous ideologies that undermine public health.” |
Ed100 blog: Health and Learning: What Can Schools Do? Physical and Mental Health Affect Learning. |
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) $1,065 million cut |
“The Budget proposes to refocus activities that were formerly part of SAMHSA and reduces waste by eliminating inefficient funding.” |
Ed100 blog Mental health for learning School communities increasingly recognize that the social-emotional challenges children face must be addressed in order for them to learn. |
Health programs: $180 million in cuts - Administration for a Healthy America - Sexual Risk Avoidance Program and Teen Pregnancy |
“Consistent with the recently announced HHS reorganization, theBudget relocates these programs within the newly formed Administration for Healthy America.” |
Ed100 blog Sex Education in California |
Even before the release of the proposed budget, the Trump administration issued executive orders to implement elements of the Project 2025 agenda. For more details, read: Federal cuts ahead for education.
These executive orders have been met with a swarm of legal challenges. Education Week is an excellent resource for details of each lawsuit and its status as it makes its way through the courts.
What’s a skinny budget?
The budget released in May is called a “skinny budget” because many details are left out. It cuts education funding by 15%. The full presidential proposal, expected later in June, will fill in the blanks. For more information on budget timelines, read this summary of the federal budget process.
It is up to Congress to adopt a final budget and submit it to the president. In the prior Trump term, Congress acted with independence — it did not adopt the deep education cuts Trump proposed. But it's another Congress and another time. Representatives will be listening for feedback and making their decisions.
Part of our democratic process is the ability to let your elected officials know your thoughts on important issues. Contact your member of Congress. Now's the time.
Many organizations have expressed concerns about the impact of the budget on education, children, and families. Below is a list where you can review their positions, add your voice, or join in collective action.
After school and summer programs
National Endowment for the Arts:
Institute of Museum and Library Services
National Endowment for the Humanities
Education Funding
Health and cuts to the National Institute of Health
Buscar aquí en el contenido del blog y todas las lecciones.
Iniciar sesión con correo electrónico
We will send your Login Link to your email
address. Click on the link and you will be
logged into Ed100. No more passwords to
remember!
Preguntas y comentarios
Para comentar o responder, por favor inicie sesión .